I've sent you a fully-edited version of your story.
Your insulting comments aside, I can't say that I have noticed any change in the culture of Lush in the two years since I joined.
The focus of the site is now, has always been and will always be on erotic stories. Yes, other activities like you describe do go on but that's certainly not why the site is here and probably not why you should be a member. I still encounter roughly the same number of people looking to do those kinds of things as I did when I first joined.
Maybe you're looking in the wrong places. Or maybe you have a bad attitude about the site and that is reflecting on your enjoyment of it. Either way, that's not Lush's problem to fix.
Now, please stop insulting people who work very hard as writers of erotic fiction. I don't really know why you had to make such a statement, even if you do truly believe it. If you've been around the site for as long as you say you have, you would know that comments like that are very offensive in this community.
A friend of mine made me watch an episode before it really came to the UK. I wasn't very impressed.
Then it took off big style and Gleeks started popping up all over the place. I thought, "Maybe I haven't given this a fair hearing," and watched some more. From there, the hatred grew. I just can't like it - it reeks of cheese and bad acting, and the mash-ups are often dreadful. When they started to enter the music charts, that really ticked me off.
I think the fact that everyone [I]expected[/I] me to like it made it even worse. I'm a big lover of musicals but Glee ain't no musical; it's a train wreck.
Milik, could you give some examples of the types of threads you would like to see in such a forum? I don't think it's a bad idea but, evidently, you're going to have to make one hell of a case for it.
I think a place for homosexual-specific topics could be quite useful and widely used. I don't think it's fair to say it's a way of segregating people—there wouldn't be restrictions on who can visit what forums depending on their sexuality. It's not about the people, it's about the content. It's quite likely that there are things that homosexuals would like to discuss but which many heterosexuals would have no interest in.
The 'Ask The...' forums are some of the most popular and things can get lost in the midst. Having a go-to place for the kinds of topics you're looking for, i.e., homosexual-specific topics, could be very helpful for a number of members.
Also, targeting a forum at a group of people with potentially similar experiences in life could encourage members to ask questions and discuss topics they might have felt uncomfortable airing to a much broader audience.
I thoroughly enjoyed Tess. It's thought-provoking, even over a century later.
Thanks for the heads up. I've only done this once but I shan't again.
When I write, I get REALLY involved with my characters and it has, on occasion, been commented that I have a knack for bringing them to life.
I can only speak from personal experience. When I write, I like to know a lot of detail about my characters—a bit of history, their links to other characters, how they would react to certain events, what their weaknesses are. That doesn't all go down on the page explicitly but because I know them, I can make their part in the story seem more real.
It's great to know a lot about your characters but your readers don't need to know everything. Leave some things unsaid, or to the imagination; allude to a character's past but don't necessarily elaborate.
Know your characters first and then write naturally. If certain information turns out to be useful for your story, then it's already at your fingertips.
I actually obsess about my characters. One of my projects just now is a spin-off from one of my more popular stories here, which is actually part of the same story but from the perspective of a secondary character. It explores things about her which were only hinted at in the original store, but we also see a side that we would not normally see.
Argh. I love talking characters! Ethan Blake—I fucking love that guy; you don't know the HALF of it.
Because a lot of readers don't know how to critique a story, for one. "It's nice to be nice," they say...
Liking the smell, feel and look of a book are such superficial and, dare I say it, selfish reasons to want to preserve them. Similarly, the fact that eBooks save a lot of space isn't, for me, a good enough argument for us to go that direction either.
I don't mean to offend anyone, and maybe I'm taking this topic more seriously than other, but we should really be looking at the bigger picture with respect to the publishing industry. If we move to using eBooks almost exclusively, that could have a seriously positive impact on the environment. As I said before, it's also opening up more opportunities for amateurs to break into the writing market (Lush Publishing is living proof).
On the other side of the coin, we are losing book stores and libraries. However, our attachment to these is largely sentimental and, in relative terms, won't cost that many jobs. I don't mean to belittle the value of sentiment but, let's be honest, we will get by. I imagine libraries will become archives, dedicated to preserving the history of the printed word, rather more similar to a museum.
I'm happy to listen to both sides of the argument but saying things like, "I love the feel of flicking pages," does nothing to persuade me that we should stick with printed books.
The leader of my religious organisation just turned 85 and shows no signs of letting up. In fact, he just recently determined to increase his efforts and do even more to support us than ever before.
I'm not saying everyone can or should be like him, just that there are old geezers out there who remain effective in their roles. Good on old Benny for acknowledging that he's not one of them and doing the decent thing.
What does a retired Pope do with what's left of his life though?