Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
lafayettemister
1 week ago
Straight Male
0 miles · New Orleans
Profile Stories
8
Ebooks Follows
18
Forum
4.6k
Groups

Forum
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Poppet


I'm the same as you.. To me it is degrading. I do not want a man's cum on my face. But I am anywhere on my body.. Cum belongs inside me! Not on me. I can't stand it when guys think that's hot.. That's not okay with me ever!


Some women think it's hot too. It's ok if you're opposed to titty fucking or having cum shot onto your face or body. It's your body and you get to make the rules. BUT, what one person finds degrading, another person finds hot. Some women enjoy feeling hot cum splash onto their asses, or pussies, or stomachs. Some even like facials. Some people, men and women, like doing things that turn their partners on. They get enjoyment out of seeing their partner enjoy themselves. Then, the favor is returned in some way.

It's degrading for a man to cum on your face when he knows you don't like it. It's not degrading as a whole, that's for each person to decide individually.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by CurlyGirly
Dayum! That was a car crash. Awful but hard to look away. I would be embarrassed for him if I didn't think he was such a douchebag. YeeHaw?? Really?

And what was with that face and noise he made at about 1:00. Looked like he was having a heart attack and reminded me of this.



Now, I'm going to be saying to everyone today "You Big Dummy."


Anyway, what were we talking about...yep, Axl sucks!



You Fish Eyed Fool!! Axl is overweight but has had some face work done. He looks like Fireman Bill with a mustache.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Seems perfect for a bisexual person. A shemale has the best of both worlds for people who like both worlds.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Holy crap, someone put him out of his out-of-breath misery!! And the fake Slash, complete with black hat but shitty guitar play.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Magical_felix


See? Dense.

He thinks he is tolerant because he doesn't drag them naked out of bed. What weird imagery. I mean, just a weird place to go in his head.

He thinks that tolerance is belittling them first and crudely describing their sex lives then saying, well I don't think they should burn in hell for it.

Just very bizarre or maybe misguided. It could be he's just trying to be cool lafayette or like bad boy lafayette. Who knows..

Is there a word that combines dense and misguided?


That was sarcasm, dude. I'm not belittling anyone, I'm only saying that sex with shemales isn't a "free zone". In no way am I intolerant of anyone for their sex lives. I don't care who fucks who or how they do it.

edit... i'd use "fudgepacking" sarcastically regardless of the genders of one or both participants
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by SexOnWheels



Okie Dokie, Gay Act then...

Puritanical does have a religious element, on that you are dead right old chap (its part of my point of why I used the word), looking up in my dictionary here..."Very strict in moral (and or religious) matters, often excessivlely so: rigidly austere. by extension one might add opinionated and judgemental.

You know I hummed an hahhed whether to put either Puritanical OR Prudish, which is probably more apt... I plumped for Puritanical to make myself look more intelligent. I kinda think it still worked as a device to annoy.


Neither puritanical or prudish work. Again, both of those would require me to pass judgement on the morality of the act. I'm not doing that. I'm not shocked that in the world men have sex with other men. My sensibilities aren't offended with the knowledge of fudge packing. I.e., not a prude. If you like taking it up the ass or fucking some dude while giving him the "reach around", go for it. We should all be able to fuck whomever we wish. Nor do I think that a gay man or lesbian woman is breaking the laws of nature and are destined to eternity in the fiery pits of hell because of their sex life. And not dragging them naked out of bed and straight to Bible study to save their souls.

You didn't annoy me. A factual inaccuracy isn't an annoyance.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Nikki703


I dont know what you are talking about!! Every sleepover I have ever been to always ended up in an all girl orgy!! At least until all the Pizza delivery boys with their 9" cocks showed up!


Yea, but that's your own fault Nikki. You did order extra sausage.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Pinkluva



At least I know how to spell. Actually look at our fucking profiles you fucking douche bag. We are NOT pretending to be anything. We are actually in love. It is sad that you don't have a woman LIKE me. GO FUCK YOUR GOD DAMN SELF, NO ONE gives a shit. Okay?!?


In my experience, the more a couple professes their love on the internet the closer they are to divorcing. It's like you're trying to convince yourselves how much you love each other by posting it publicly. If you really do love each other that much, then you wouldn't need to talk about it. True love is understood, not overstated.

And WMM is not a complete asshole, just maybe 40% asshole. And he's a good enough guy not to kick your ass, but your husband could pay for your mouthiness. As far as DW, my money is on her.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by SexOnWheels


No one (I) ever said sex between man and woman is anything other than straight sex.

No, if you fuck someone of the same sex it's called a homosexual act, or "experimenting", to take the further step of calling this person gay would require this person to have engaged in prolonged homosexual acts over an extended period of time. That's when you can begin to attempt to label someone else. Once you do label someone though you run the risk of copping a label yourself.

Here's one...

Puritanical.



Fucking a "shemale" is more than an experiment. Time and frequency are irrelevant. If a man's sexual history is of being with other men, then he's a gay guy. It's not a label, it just is what it is.

Here's a label...

Moron. Puritanical, sorry but that doesn't fit. You could call me puritanical if I passed some sort of religious judgement on someone because of his sexuality. I didn't do that. I offer no judgement, anyone can fuck whomever the wish. My only point is, if a man fucks another person in the ass because there a cock where the pussy would be... it's a gay act.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
First, the facebook post by Richard Neill...

Hi , as a man I must ask why you have lied to us for all these years . As a child I watched your advertisements with interest as to how at this wonderful time of the month that the female gets to enjoy so many things ,I felt a little jealous. I mean bike riding , rollercoasters, dancing, parachuting, why couldn't I get to enjoy this time of joy and 'blue water' and wings !! Dam my penis!! Then I got a girlfriend, was so happy and couldn't wait for this joyous adventurous time of the month to happen .....you lied !! There was no joy , no extreme sports , no blue water spilling over wings and no rocking soundtrack oh no no no. Instead I had to fight against every male urge I had to resist screaming wooaaahhhhh bodddyyyyyyfooorrrmmm bodyformed for youuuuuuu as my lady changed from the loving , gentle, normal skin coloured lady to the little girl from the exorcist with added venom and extra 360 degree head spin. Thanks for setting me up for a fall bodyform , you crafty bugger.

Funny, tongue in cheek. I don't think the man was really complaining, just being funny. But Bodyform's response is even funnier...




"the blood coursing from our uteri like a crimson landslide" hahahaha
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by SexOnWheels
Funny how these days, straight guys who are these huge studs and are very popular with women usually always have these boring straight as arrow black and white opinions about what's gay and what constitutes straight, presumably because they've fucked a thousand chicks they think they are mens men. Funnily enough though the Romans, Spartans, Vikings...well every single "manly" ass kicking, violent, war hungry, male dominated culture has shunned (what we today laud and envy) as studs and fanny magnets as weak, feeble minded and worst of all for today's stud muffin they were even thought of as effeminate.

It might be possible that the majority of average people don't get as much sex as they'd like and as a result have a more open idea that it might b possible to try a same sex thing , a Transexuality thing or what the hell ever they want to try to scratch that itch.


I think most people, studly men or wimpy men, hot chicks or not-as-hot chicks all know what constitutes straight and gay. If you fuck someone of the same sex, it's homosexuality. If a guy fucks another guy, he's gay. Or Bi. If you want to say sexuality is sexuality regardless of the genders, that's fine. I can accept that. But straight sex IS straight sex, between male and female.

As for the "studs" of today's world, I doubt anyone in history would view John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, Wilt Chamberlin, Ray Lewis... as effeminate because they only fuck women. Nor would anyone view Ross the Intern or David Bowie as some Spartan or Viking type ass kicking stud.

A man's sexuality has no bearing on his studliness or ass-kicking ability.
View Post
lafayettemister
Active Ink Slinger
If it walks like a dick and talks like a dick, it must be a dick.

Two people with dicks having sex is a gay act. It's not a "free zone" like it didn't count. If anyone wants to be with a man or shemale, go for it. But if you do, then you have gay tendencies. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
View Post