Active Ink Slinger
Hell if I know. I keep telling her to turn the little switch on the door knob but she's still locked in there.
Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
lafayettemister
1 week ago
Straight Male
0 miles · New Orleans
Forum
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Nikki703
This right up there with suing over coffee being too hot!! I lost picking the Saints in a football pool, can I get in on this too?
Ha, funny you say that. If I remember correctly, the lady that sued over the too-hot coffee won the case.
Active Ink Slinger
Saints fans file class action lawsuit against NFL and Roger Goodell
EW ORLEANS -- A New Orleans Saints fan is taking NFL commissioner Roger Goodell to federal court, seeking in excess of $5,000,000 in the damages. (See lawsuit)
David James Macina, a St. Tammany resident and Saints season ticket holder, filed a class-action lawsuit against Goodell and the National Football League in the U.S. District Court for the punishments meted against Saints players, coaches and management for their roles in the bounty scandal.
The judgment that the plaintiff is seeking comes from the damages brought on by Goodell and the NFL from gutting the team through suspensions, which devalued tickets, and the emotional hardship fans have had to endure during the scandal.
The lawsuit contends that Mancina and other season ticket holders “purchased their tickets with the representation, and expectation, from the Commissioner and the League that the Saints would be capable of competitively fielding a contending team comprised of the finest athletes, and the best coaches, under contract with the New Orleans Saints, or available to them through normal trades and draft choices, without dictatorial, unreasonable, vindictive, and unfounded, interference from the Commissioner and the League, devoid of due process.”
However, after the season tickets were purchased on March 21, 2012, the league didn’t inform Mancina and others season ticket holders that an investigation had been ongoing since 2009 into the illegal bounty program.
Also, that head coach Sean Payton, general manager Mickey Loomis, linebacker Jonathan Vilma and defensive end Will Smith were suspended by the league “without due process, sufficient evidence, and without consideration for the rights of the paying ticket holder Plaintiffs, and the 85,000 members of the class, summarily, without due process or credible evidence,” says the lawsuit.
“(D)ue to the unfair, prejudicial, unreasonable, and vindictive” actions by Goodell and the NFL, those suspensions severely damaged the on-field product and the value of the season tickets to Macina and other Saints fans.
EW ORLEANS -- A New Orleans Saints fan is taking NFL commissioner Roger Goodell to federal court, seeking in excess of $5,000,000 in the damages. (See lawsuit)
David James Macina, a St. Tammany resident and Saints season ticket holder, filed a class-action lawsuit against Goodell and the National Football League in the U.S. District Court for the punishments meted against Saints players, coaches and management for their roles in the bounty scandal.
The judgment that the plaintiff is seeking comes from the damages brought on by Goodell and the NFL from gutting the team through suspensions, which devalued tickets, and the emotional hardship fans have had to endure during the scandal.
The lawsuit contends that Mancina and other season ticket holders “purchased their tickets with the representation, and expectation, from the Commissioner and the League that the Saints would be capable of competitively fielding a contending team comprised of the finest athletes, and the best coaches, under contract with the New Orleans Saints, or available to them through normal trades and draft choices, without dictatorial, unreasonable, vindictive, and unfounded, interference from the Commissioner and the League, devoid of due process.”
However, after the season tickets were purchased on March 21, 2012, the league didn’t inform Mancina and others season ticket holders that an investigation had been ongoing since 2009 into the illegal bounty program.
Also, that head coach Sean Payton, general manager Mickey Loomis, linebacker Jonathan Vilma and defensive end Will Smith were suspended by the league “without due process, sufficient evidence, and without consideration for the rights of the paying ticket holder Plaintiffs, and the 85,000 members of the class, summarily, without due process or credible evidence,” says the lawsuit.
“(D)ue to the unfair, prejudicial, unreasonable, and vindictive” actions by Goodell and the NFL, those suspensions severely damaged the on-field product and the value of the season tickets to Macina and other Saints fans.
Active Ink Slinger
Oops. I'd say, "get ready, i'm going to fuck your brains out." lol
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by BoredAsHell1978
No, I am not him. I am a dear friend of his. We've been friend for many, many years and I just don't like him being so down and out. This would cheer him up. That's all. Hell, if I had small ones, I'd send him a photo, but mine aren't small enough for his liking. Plus, us being friends, that might be a bit weird. lol.
If he's as down and out as you say, then showing him your tits regardless of their size would be a good start to cheering him up. I'm a boob guy myself, but if a friend of mine decided to show me her pussy instead of her tits, I'd be very happy to see it. I wouldn't decline, "No no, I like titties so you keep your pussy pic." I think if you're truly concerned for you friend, you should start the tit-pic process by showing him your's.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Let's say that you met a woman and were quickly considering that she might be "the one" that you'd like to marry, settle down with, bring home to mom, and/or have children with.
Are there things in a woman's sexual history that would be a deal-breaker for you... or if not, would there be things that you'd rather not know or have her tell you?
In the realm of fantasy, porn, and imagination, a highly sexed, wildly-adventurous woman is a turn-on.
But what if you found out she'd been involved in more extreme sex experiences than you were used to - for example - gangbangs, bukkakes, double-penetration group sex, still enjoyed having sex with women, was involved in porn or online sex sites for pay as a performer, model or webcam girl, was a stripper at one point, worked in prostitution/escorting or was into maybe into certain fetishes that you weren't interested in.
If you found out early on in the relationship, would any of these factors dissuade you from considering her as a life-partner?
Be honest!
There are definitely some things that could prevent a woman from being my "one". If she was the main attraction in a donkey show, that would probably be a deal breaker. Past threesomes or sex with women wouldn't concern me much. Gangbang... eh. If she broke the gangbang record and pulled a 200 man chain that could turn me off. Weird, it wouldn't bother me if she'd had sex with 200 men in her past, but if she did them all at the same time it would. That may be my issue, not her's.
Incestuous relationship would be a problem, especially if it was a father-daughter thing. If she's "the one" for me, will she bring that concept of love to our son? I wouldn't want to be involved with that, nor would I want my kid involved with it. If it was with her brother, sister, cousin, uncle, aunt it could still be an issue because that person would still be a part of her life. And old habits are hard to break.
Active Ink Slinger
I've had Verizon for almost 10 years and I've never had any problem with them. Before Verizon I had AT&T and my bill was wrong every. single. month. And they always tried to blame me but it wasn't, they just couldn't get it right. With Verizon I get great phone/smartphone choices and great service. I've probably had maybe three dropped calls in the last five years. I'm due for an upgrade in December and I'm ready for my new toy.
Active Ink Slinger
35 Facts about Atari 2600, like it was able to go online to download games
While Atari first burst onto the video game scene in 1972 with Pong, for many gamers, the company's lasting legacy will always be the Atari 2600.
October 14 marks the 35th birthday of the legendary game console, which landed with a bang in 1977. It wasn't the first home video game system -- that honor belongs to the Magnavox Odyssey -- but it quickly became the most widely adopted and set the standard for many, many years.
To celebrate the console that revolutionized home entertainment, we dug up 35 factoids you might not have heard about while you were busy playing Asteroids and Pitfall.
1. It almost belonged to Magnavox.
Had things worked out a bit differently, we'd be talking about the 36th birthday of the Magnavox 2600. An earlier settlement between Atari and Magnavox over Pong gave Magnavox the rights to anything Atari produced for one year, so Atari held the system back from 1976 to 1977 to keep it their own. Good idea.
2. It was first the VCS.
The Atari 2600 wasn't the system's original name. When it hit shelves, it was called the Atari VCS (short for Video Computer System). It wasn't until 1982 that it was given its now famous moniker.
3. Stellaaaaa!
Actually, before it hit shelves, the Atari 2600 had another name: "Stella." The project's codename was named after one of the engineers' bicycles, and is currently the name of a widely downloaded Atari 2600 emulator.
4. It was kind of expensive.
The initial price for the system was $200. That might seem like a pittance, but in 1977 that was the equivalent of $775 today. And you thought Sony's initial PlayStation 3 pricing was insane.
5. It owes its success to Space Invaders.
While porting arcade games to home consoles would eventually become everyday business, it was unheard of in 1979. A year later, the Atari 2600 featured a port of Space Invaders, considered the first home console 'killer app,' turning the system into a must-have and ultimately grossing over $100 million.
6. But it owes even more to Rick Mauer.
Who? The guy who programmed Space Invaders for the Atari 2600, that's who. Despite how big of a hit the game turned out to be, Mauer is rumored to have received just $11,000 for his work. He never programmed another game for Atari.
7. It's a Hall of Famer.
In 2007, the Atari 2600 was inducted into the National Toy Hall of Fame. It's one of just 46 toys to hold that honor. Nintendo's Game Boy is the only other video game system there.
8. Its famous creator didn't actually create it.
Most gamers associate Atari co-founder Nolan Bushnell with everything Atari, but it turns out he wasn't responsible for the 2600's development. Engineers Steve Mayer and Larry Emmons, who ran a think tank called Cyan Engineering, came up with the idea.
9. It led to Bushnell's departure.
Atari's sale to Warner Communications in 1976 was done expressly to raise the capital to finish production on the 2600. A year after the system's release, culture clashes between Bushnell and Warner execs reached a point where Bushnell opted to leave the company.
10. It was almost a Disney product.
Warner wasn't Atari's first choice for an investor, though. Both MCA and Disney were approached first, but declined.
11. Now in stereo!
The sound itself might have only been a bunch of bleeps and bloops, but in its original design, the 2600 had two speakers in the top deck to offer stereo sound to players.
12. Heavy Sixers.
The first versions of the 2600 to ship were called "Heavy Sixers," so named because of a thicker plastic case and the six switches on the front. Geeky band name, anyone?
13. It wasn't an immediate hit.
The first truly popular home console wasn't all that popular when it first came out. In fact, it only sold 250,000 units during its first year.
14. It was a label snob.
As was the case with many 2600 games, Space Invaders 2600 was released with four different labels: Red, Silver, Picture, and Text. Today, the picture version is the most desired by collectors.
15. Sears sold their own version.
Couldn't get your hands on an Atari 2600 in 1978? Sears had you covered with the Sears Video Arcade System, a white-label version of Atari's console. It wasn't a shameless rip-off, however -- a full partnership with Atari gave Sears the right to sell the newly branded machine in order to increase exposure.
16. It wasn't cheap to build.
It might not seem like much by today's standards, but the Atari 2600 cost $100 million to develop.
17. It held the first Easter Egg.
The 2600 game Adventure has gaming's first Easter Egg. Developer Warren Robinett, frustrated with the company's policy of not crediting workers, put a message reading "Created by Warren Robinett" in a secret room in the game, but didn't tell a single co-worker.
18. It stuck around longer than you think.
Most gamers assume the Atari 2600 completely died out alongside the video game crash of 1983, but the system secretly hung around for much longer. In fact, the last game released for the system in the U.S., the aptly-titled Secret Quest, came out in 1989.
19. Its biggest game was a coin-op classic.
Space Invaders might have been the first killer app for the 2600, but its biggest seller was another arcade blockbuster: Pac-Man, which sold 7 million copies.
20. Speech! Speech!
Believe it or not, two Atari 2600 games could actually pull off digitized speech: Quadrun and Open Sesame. Though neither were big hits, they were programming wonders considering the power limitations of the console.
21. Attack of the clones.
As the 2600 took off, countless clone machines emerged. One of the strangest was from Columbia House Record Club called the Columbia Home Arcade. Only sold to members of the club's mailing list, it's a serious collector's item.
22. It supported the 99%.
Or one of its games did, at least. Tax Avoiders, a 1982 game for the system that revolved around a millionaire dodging the IRS, was written by a former IRS agent.
23. It had lots of games.
Most gamers can only name a handful of 2600 games, but by the time the system was replaced, more than 400 games had been made for it. That might seem negligible by today's standards, but it blew its competition out of the water. Only about 150 games were made for Mattel's Intellivision.
24. It was buried by ET.
Atari paid $21 million to license the video game rights to E.T. That proved disastrous, as the lousy game wound up contributing to the Video Game Crash of 1983. Most of the resulting games are buried in a desert today.
25. It could go online.
The Sega Dreamcast might have been the first game console to popularize online play, but way back in the early 80s, a fledgling company called CVC released the GameLine for the Atari. The chunky cartridge could connect to servers over phone lines and players could download games to play on their console. It was way ahead of its time, though sadly the GameLine would fade into obscurity after the company folded in 1983.
26. Some of its games are worth a fortune.
The rarest game for the Atari 2600 is Air Raid. Only 13 copies are known to exist today, and they're worth as much as $31,000 each.
27. It took part in the soda wars.
Coca-Cola commissioned a 2600 game from Atari called "Pepsi Invaders" that was given exclusively to its Atlanta employees. The Space Invaders clone let players shot the letters "P E P S I" rather than aliens. It's worth a good $2,000 these days.
28. It had a light gun.
Think the whole light gun thing started with the Nintendo Zapper for the NES? Think again. The 2600 had a light gun controller as well, but only one game — Sentinel — used it.
29. You could play Atari 2600 games on the Intellivision II.
In a twist unheard of in today's console wars, Intellivision released the 'System Changer' adapter for the Intellivision II system that would let games play Atari cartridges on their rig. That's like Sony releasing an Xbox 360 adapter. Heresy!
30. Who you gonna call? Not the Ghostbusters II.
Though Activision released a pretty awesome Ghostbusters 2600 game, the company chose not to release 1989's Ghostbusters II in the U.S. due to the system's waning popularity. Instead, it was exclusively released in Europe. Licensing issues have kept it from appearing in any anthologies, sadly.
31. It featured the power of Chuck Norris.
Action movie star and internet sensation Chuck Norris starred in a game for the system, though it didn't turn out so hot. Released in 1983, Chuck Norris Superkicks was forced to change its name to Kung Fu Superkicks after the license to use Norris' name expired.
32. It had the first movie licensed game ever.
Few action films are released these days without video game tie-ins. That all started with the Atari 2600 and Raiders of the Lost Ark, which let players try to dig up the Ark while dodging thieves, avoiding tsetse flies and struggling with bad controls.
33. It helped Jack Black get his start.
Atari loved using celebs in their advertising campaigns, but little did they know they'd feature one of today's biggest stars when they cast a then-unknown kid named Jack Black to don a pith helmet and pimp Pitfall.
34. It had a few games for adults only.
While Atari hoped to bill the 2600 as a family system ("Have you played Atari today?"), developer Mystique drew a line in the sand by making adult/pornographic games for the 2600, including Custer's Last Stand, widely viewed as the most offensive game of all time.
35. It had a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the RAM powering your phone.
While today's systems launch with bleeding-edge computing power, the Atari 2600 has just 128 bytes of RAM. That's bytes, not kilobytes. Comparatively, an iPhone 5 sports 1 GB RAM.
While Atari first burst onto the video game scene in 1972 with Pong, for many gamers, the company's lasting legacy will always be the Atari 2600.
October 14 marks the 35th birthday of the legendary game console, which landed with a bang in 1977. It wasn't the first home video game system -- that honor belongs to the Magnavox Odyssey -- but it quickly became the most widely adopted and set the standard for many, many years.
To celebrate the console that revolutionized home entertainment, we dug up 35 factoids you might not have heard about while you were busy playing Asteroids and Pitfall.
1. It almost belonged to Magnavox.
Had things worked out a bit differently, we'd be talking about the 36th birthday of the Magnavox 2600. An earlier settlement between Atari and Magnavox over Pong gave Magnavox the rights to anything Atari produced for one year, so Atari held the system back from 1976 to 1977 to keep it their own. Good idea.
2. It was first the VCS.
The Atari 2600 wasn't the system's original name. When it hit shelves, it was called the Atari VCS (short for Video Computer System). It wasn't until 1982 that it was given its now famous moniker.
3. Stellaaaaa!
Actually, before it hit shelves, the Atari 2600 had another name: "Stella." The project's codename was named after one of the engineers' bicycles, and is currently the name of a widely downloaded Atari 2600 emulator.
4. It was kind of expensive.
The initial price for the system was $200. That might seem like a pittance, but in 1977 that was the equivalent of $775 today. And you thought Sony's initial PlayStation 3 pricing was insane.
5. It owes its success to Space Invaders.
While porting arcade games to home consoles would eventually become everyday business, it was unheard of in 1979. A year later, the Atari 2600 featured a port of Space Invaders, considered the first home console 'killer app,' turning the system into a must-have and ultimately grossing over $100 million.
6. But it owes even more to Rick Mauer.
Who? The guy who programmed Space Invaders for the Atari 2600, that's who. Despite how big of a hit the game turned out to be, Mauer is rumored to have received just $11,000 for his work. He never programmed another game for Atari.
7. It's a Hall of Famer.
In 2007, the Atari 2600 was inducted into the National Toy Hall of Fame. It's one of just 46 toys to hold that honor. Nintendo's Game Boy is the only other video game system there.
8. Its famous creator didn't actually create it.
Most gamers associate Atari co-founder Nolan Bushnell with everything Atari, but it turns out he wasn't responsible for the 2600's development. Engineers Steve Mayer and Larry Emmons, who ran a think tank called Cyan Engineering, came up with the idea.
9. It led to Bushnell's departure.
Atari's sale to Warner Communications in 1976 was done expressly to raise the capital to finish production on the 2600. A year after the system's release, culture clashes between Bushnell and Warner execs reached a point where Bushnell opted to leave the company.
10. It was almost a Disney product.
Warner wasn't Atari's first choice for an investor, though. Both MCA and Disney were approached first, but declined.
11. Now in stereo!
The sound itself might have only been a bunch of bleeps and bloops, but in its original design, the 2600 had two speakers in the top deck to offer stereo sound to players.
12. Heavy Sixers.
The first versions of the 2600 to ship were called "Heavy Sixers," so named because of a thicker plastic case and the six switches on the front. Geeky band name, anyone?
13. It wasn't an immediate hit.
The first truly popular home console wasn't all that popular when it first came out. In fact, it only sold 250,000 units during its first year.
14. It was a label snob.
As was the case with many 2600 games, Space Invaders 2600 was released with four different labels: Red, Silver, Picture, and Text. Today, the picture version is the most desired by collectors.
15. Sears sold their own version.
Couldn't get your hands on an Atari 2600 in 1978? Sears had you covered with the Sears Video Arcade System, a white-label version of Atari's console. It wasn't a shameless rip-off, however -- a full partnership with Atari gave Sears the right to sell the newly branded machine in order to increase exposure.
16. It wasn't cheap to build.
It might not seem like much by today's standards, but the Atari 2600 cost $100 million to develop.
17. It held the first Easter Egg.
The 2600 game Adventure has gaming's first Easter Egg. Developer Warren Robinett, frustrated with the company's policy of not crediting workers, put a message reading "Created by Warren Robinett" in a secret room in the game, but didn't tell a single co-worker.
18. It stuck around longer than you think.
Most gamers assume the Atari 2600 completely died out alongside the video game crash of 1983, but the system secretly hung around for much longer. In fact, the last game released for the system in the U.S., the aptly-titled Secret Quest, came out in 1989.
19. Its biggest game was a coin-op classic.
Space Invaders might have been the first killer app for the 2600, but its biggest seller was another arcade blockbuster: Pac-Man, which sold 7 million copies.
20. Speech! Speech!
Believe it or not, two Atari 2600 games could actually pull off digitized speech: Quadrun and Open Sesame. Though neither were big hits, they were programming wonders considering the power limitations of the console.
21. Attack of the clones.
As the 2600 took off, countless clone machines emerged. One of the strangest was from Columbia House Record Club called the Columbia Home Arcade. Only sold to members of the club's mailing list, it's a serious collector's item.
22. It supported the 99%.
Or one of its games did, at least. Tax Avoiders, a 1982 game for the system that revolved around a millionaire dodging the IRS, was written by a former IRS agent.
23. It had lots of games.
Most gamers can only name a handful of 2600 games, but by the time the system was replaced, more than 400 games had been made for it. That might seem negligible by today's standards, but it blew its competition out of the water. Only about 150 games were made for Mattel's Intellivision.
24. It was buried by ET.
Atari paid $21 million to license the video game rights to E.T. That proved disastrous, as the lousy game wound up contributing to the Video Game Crash of 1983. Most of the resulting games are buried in a desert today.
25. It could go online.
The Sega Dreamcast might have been the first game console to popularize online play, but way back in the early 80s, a fledgling company called CVC released the GameLine for the Atari. The chunky cartridge could connect to servers over phone lines and players could download games to play on their console. It was way ahead of its time, though sadly the GameLine would fade into obscurity after the company folded in 1983.
26. Some of its games are worth a fortune.
The rarest game for the Atari 2600 is Air Raid. Only 13 copies are known to exist today, and they're worth as much as $31,000 each.
27. It took part in the soda wars.
Coca-Cola commissioned a 2600 game from Atari called "Pepsi Invaders" that was given exclusively to its Atlanta employees. The Space Invaders clone let players shot the letters "P E P S I" rather than aliens. It's worth a good $2,000 these days.
28. It had a light gun.
Think the whole light gun thing started with the Nintendo Zapper for the NES? Think again. The 2600 had a light gun controller as well, but only one game — Sentinel — used it.
29. You could play Atari 2600 games on the Intellivision II.
In a twist unheard of in today's console wars, Intellivision released the 'System Changer' adapter for the Intellivision II system that would let games play Atari cartridges on their rig. That's like Sony releasing an Xbox 360 adapter. Heresy!
30. Who you gonna call? Not the Ghostbusters II.
Though Activision released a pretty awesome Ghostbusters 2600 game, the company chose not to release 1989's Ghostbusters II in the U.S. due to the system's waning popularity. Instead, it was exclusively released in Europe. Licensing issues have kept it from appearing in any anthologies, sadly.
31. It featured the power of Chuck Norris.
Action movie star and internet sensation Chuck Norris starred in a game for the system, though it didn't turn out so hot. Released in 1983, Chuck Norris Superkicks was forced to change its name to Kung Fu Superkicks after the license to use Norris' name expired.
32. It had the first movie licensed game ever.
Few action films are released these days without video game tie-ins. That all started with the Atari 2600 and Raiders of the Lost Ark, which let players try to dig up the Ark while dodging thieves, avoiding tsetse flies and struggling with bad controls.
33. It helped Jack Black get his start.
Atari loved using celebs in their advertising campaigns, but little did they know they'd feature one of today's biggest stars when they cast a then-unknown kid named Jack Black to don a pith helmet and pimp Pitfall.
34. It had a few games for adults only.
While Atari hoped to bill the 2600 as a family system ("Have you played Atari today?"), developer Mystique drew a line in the sand by making adult/pornographic games for the 2600, including Custer's Last Stand, widely viewed as the most offensive game of all time.
35. It had a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the RAM powering your phone.
While today's systems launch with bleeding-edge computing power, the Atari 2600 has just 128 bytes of RAM. That's bytes, not kilobytes. Comparatively, an iPhone 5 sports 1 GB RAM.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by sprite
oh, and one other thing. kids are way smarter and intuitive then you give them credit for. they pick up on stuff like 'daddy hates mommy, but he likes that blonde lady' or 'mommy really like 'uncle' John'. if you have kids, and you're cheating, think of the lessons you are teaching them. kids learn by example.
That's not necessarily true. Many marriages fall apart but it doesn't mean that daddy hates mommy or mommy hates daddy. I've known many couples that weren't meant to be together anymore, but they didn't hate each other. It's possible to live "normal" lives together for the kids without sending off hateful and hurtful vibes. Kids do pick up on that stuff and it should be avoided. Get out if that's the case but most marriages end because of incompatibility rather than hate.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Magical_felix
I don't know about all that.......
I was just meaning, come on man, relax... I was referring to you saying woman have a double standard. They don't really. It's just good to be a gentleman.
I'll agree, wording it more seriously would have been better. It's easy for me to sympathize with a cheater...
Being a gentleman is a good thing. I'll back you on that notion all day.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Magical_felix
I think everyone saw how comedic the way she asked her question was. Plus she doesn't insult her husband in the same way this guy insults his wife.
Plus, there is a double standard. You're a southern man right? Or maybe not a double standard but it's called being a gentleman.
Some did, some didn't. And you're right, I do agree. His presentation of the situation was pretty tactless and surely didn't endear him to anyone. Do you think he'd have gotten any different response had he worded it differently or less offensive? I don't know.
I am a southern man and at one time I was a gentleman. Not so much anymore, my mistakes and transgressions don't allow me to call myself a southern gentleman anymore. Even though I wouldn't publicly shame my wife like he did, I'm still not the model husband to be making judgments on others.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Magical_felix
I believe I was joking. It was an easy anal joke. I mean, I suggest greek style because she is greek.
Fair enough. However, there were others in that thread that thought she should go through with it. Others that didn't. But in that thread there's is lack of name calling and hatred for her. People weren't calling her a bitch, whore, slut, coward, selfish, need, miss nasty pants. She saw a black guy with a big bulge in her pants and she got lots of supportive, "you should think about it and talk to your hubby" kind of talk. This guys gets crucified.
edit.. just read further. there was one a-hole that called her.. overly done
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Cheating when there are children involved is a WHOLE other kind of situation. It's no longer about two adults with life experience taking risks and playing relationship-roullette if they get caught.
Worst case scenario if you get caught cheating - someone is emotionally devastated - both people make a judgement call based on their own best interests - and life goes on. You even have that option of never talking to that person again.
When you cheat with kids involved in the peripherals of the situation, you run the risk of losing access to the kids, those kids hating you for hurting mommy or daddy, emotional manipulation and blackmail... and those kids are inheriting major emotional baggage because of it. Kids are innocent in these situations, it's not fair to have them accidentally caught in the cross-fires when a cheating parent gets caught. The risk potential is off the charts.
When you chose to have kids, it means you lose the luxury of 'me, me, me' and have to think about the bigger picture and the emotional and psychological well-being of those beings that you created, especially when you chose to make decisions involving deception and tossing respect out the window in matters of the 'family unit'.
I agree with all that. Cheating with kids is not a good idea. And I think he should reconsider.
Active Ink Slinger
Ok for wife to cheat, not ok for husband to cheat
[quote=]I think its funny that i just read another thread similar situation, married, not getting laid, the only difference was that the one saying "should i cheat?" was a guy and all the girls and guys jump at him saying he was dumb, a bastard and an asshole.1gnPoZwk1QQtlnwD
LOL read here if you wanna see the other side of the coin http://www.lushstories.com/forum/yaf_postst21659_What39s-your-view-on-married-men-seeking-casual-sex.aspx
Quote by Jillian22
Sex at home is almost non - existent. I've been running in the park every morning and have met a really hot Black guy who has expressed interest in me. He says I have a black girls booty and I'm sure he fantasizes about having sex with me as I do about him when I masturbate. But It's not something i've ever done before and I can't imagine ever cheating on my husband, but I want to feel a man who appreciates me thrusting into me so badly. Plus I know he has a big penis from the bulge in his pants. I really want to feel it inside of me. But I'm afraid. I am married but it just seems like I'm living with my brother and not my husband. Advice? anyone did this before? Been in this situation? I am greek and would be completely disowned by my family even knew I was thinking about a black cock. I need advice. Live? or let it go? help me sisters!!!
Quote by Magical_felix
My answer would be, yes.
And since you are Greek, I suggest you do it Greek-style.
[quote=]I think its funny that i just read another thread similar situation, married, not getting laid, the only difference was that the one saying "should i cheat?" was a guy and all the girls and guys jump at him saying he was dumb, a bastard and an asshole.1gnPoZwk1QQtlnwD
LOL read here if you wanna see the other side of the coin http://www.lushstories.com/forum/yaf_postst21659_What39s-your-view-on-married-men-seeking-casual-sex.aspx
Active Ink Slinger
To the OP. You may be a really shitty guy, but maybe not. It's a little easy to paint this guy as an awful person, but he's not a murderer. There is a slight double standard here. If a wife came onto Lush talking about how her husband has gotten big and fat and has horribly foul smelling farts and he wasn't satisfying her needs... no one would be calling her a names like: dick, selfish, nasty, dickhead, jerk. Everyone would be "there there, it's ok. if he's not fulfilling your every need and desire as a woman you should definitely go out and find some young big dicked stud to fuck your lights out. You go girl!" Give me a break.
As he said, leaving isn't an option because of the kids. Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't love his wife. But he clearly loves his kids. People always talk about deadbeat dads and men that leave the wives and children, talk about how we wish men would "think of the kids". Well, here's a guy that's doing that. We're going to shit on the guy because he wants to be around to raise his kids? Nah, I'm not buying that. Nor do I buy the concept that kids are "better off" when their parents divorce and all the stress of home life goes away. If there's daily yelling, screaming, arguing, fighting or constant verbal/physical confrontations, yes. Otherwise, sticking around for the kids isn't such a bad thing. As mentioned earlier, he never said he loves his wife. Never said he doesn't either. Maybe he loves her but isn't "IN" love with her.
Leaving isn't as easy as it sounds. As the father of children it's hard to just up and leave knowing that in our society you'll only get partial custody and your relationship with your kids will be limited. How many wives would leave their husbands if they knew that after leaving, they'd only see their kids every other weekend? And that the person you were unable to live with is the person raising your kids without your input. Not many, I promise you.
Dude, if you want to have an affair do it. But know that it's not good for your own personal soul. From one cheater to a potential cheater, don't go down that road unless you're certain you can live with it. And know that if you get caught, you will lose in divorce. You'll lose the kids and doing all those things you mentioned. No band practice, doctor's appointments, all that stuff will be done by the primary custodian. Your wife. You may "get" to do it on occassion, but it won't be your choice when you can or can't. After you cheat, you'll see a different man in the mirror. It's not all pussy and cum, it will weigh on your mind.
edit.... A quick search of Lush stories with the tag "cheating" opens 28 pages totaling 693 stories
As he said, leaving isn't an option because of the kids. Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't love his wife. But he clearly loves his kids. People always talk about deadbeat dads and men that leave the wives and children, talk about how we wish men would "think of the kids". Well, here's a guy that's doing that. We're going to shit on the guy because he wants to be around to raise his kids? Nah, I'm not buying that. Nor do I buy the concept that kids are "better off" when their parents divorce and all the stress of home life goes away. If there's daily yelling, screaming, arguing, fighting or constant verbal/physical confrontations, yes. Otherwise, sticking around for the kids isn't such a bad thing. As mentioned earlier, he never said he loves his wife. Never said he doesn't either. Maybe he loves her but isn't "IN" love with her.
Leaving isn't as easy as it sounds. As the father of children it's hard to just up and leave knowing that in our society you'll only get partial custody and your relationship with your kids will be limited. How many wives would leave their husbands if they knew that after leaving, they'd only see their kids every other weekend? And that the person you were unable to live with is the person raising your kids without your input. Not many, I promise you.
Dude, if you want to have an affair do it. But know that it's not good for your own personal soul. From one cheater to a potential cheater, don't go down that road unless you're certain you can live with it. And know that if you get caught, you will lose in divorce. You'll lose the kids and doing all those things you mentioned. No band practice, doctor's appointments, all that stuff will be done by the primary custodian. Your wife. You may "get" to do it on occassion, but it won't be your choice when you can or can't. After you cheat, you'll see a different man in the mirror. It's not all pussy and cum, it will weigh on your mind.
edit.... A quick search of Lush stories with the tag "cheating" opens 28 pages totaling 693 stories
Active Ink Slinger
Do the opposite of what I've described. Moan, move your hips with his. Grab his hair, push his mouth to your mouth and/or to your tits. Wrap your legs around him. REach down and play with your clit or his balls. Lots of things can be done to make missionary more exciting.
Active Ink Slinger
I've had good missionary and bad missionary. The bad was because she basically just laid there. No hip movement to match mine. No feet up with her heels on my ass. Very little if any hands on my ass or back of my head. Basically she let me use her pussy as a masturbation toy. Which as I type it sounds like a good plan, but it wasn't.
Active Ink Slinger
I'll start with a wetness test in order to see if and how much she's aroused.
Active Ink Slinger
The Tebow train cometh. Maybe God really is watching.... according to YahooSports....
"Sanchez, who wears jersey No. 6, has 6 touchdown passes and 6 interceptions so far. He's averaging 6.6 yards per attempt, and his longest completion is 66 yards. His passer rating: 66.6.
Throw in a pregame tweet from Tebow noting that the Jets-Texans clash was the 666th Monday Night Football game, followed by the obligatory biblical passage, and the NFL might as well start printing Satanchez jerseys in green-and-white."
There you have it. Tebow is on God's team. Satanchez plays for the devil.
"Sanchez, who wears jersey No. 6, has 6 touchdown passes and 6 interceptions so far. He's averaging 6.6 yards per attempt, and his longest completion is 66 yards. His passer rating: 66.6.
Throw in a pregame tweet from Tebow noting that the Jets-Texans clash was the 666th Monday Night Football game, followed by the obligatory biblical passage, and the NFL might as well start printing Satanchez jerseys in green-and-white."
There you have it. Tebow is on God's team. Satanchez plays for the devil.
Active Ink Slinger
Does having a someone there to enjoy it with you count as a little thing?
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by WellMadeMale
Obviously, you've never followed Orton's career. He single-handedly nearly ruined football in Chicago and he spent the next few years, wrecking the Denver Broncos and making everyone want to punch him in the face.
This farce is hilarious (ongoing for the past few years): https://twitter.com/KingNeckbeard
Kyle Orton will lead your team to the red zone, then he'll cut your heart out, time and time again. He's an improvement over Matt Cassell, but hell, so is Mark Sanchez.
I agree, Orton isn't a great QB. Just my opinion, but that team won't ever play hard for Romo again. They have no faith in him. If the choices are, no one plays hard for Romo, and they play harder for Orton.. play Orton. Dallas really needs a restart on QB as a whole. Get a few good games out of Orton, Romo will take them nowhere.
In a perfect world, Dallas wouldn't have either of those two guys. Orton over Romo, Romo over Orton.... either way the choices are bad. At least Orton would give them a different look for now.
Sanchez is crumbling. The Tebow train is going to run him over.
Active Ink Slinger
I'm going to go with no sex at all. Definitely not your performing oral sex on her. And as DD said, a condom won't protect you. If you stay in this relationship and it becomes a long term commited thing, then you'll have some decisions to make. If you have any sexual contact with her you have to accept the fact that you could very possibly contract herpes. It may not be very PC, but it's your body and if you don't want to get herpes, then you need to move on. Unless you stay with this woman for the rest of your life, then you'll have to tell all YOUR future partners of your condition and risk losing them when they decide against staying with you. Could be your future soulmate that walks away. Sometimes life sucks, this is one of those times you may have to make a choice that is hurtful to someone else but is in your very best interest.
