Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
overmykneenow
2 days ago
Straight Male
0 miles · England

Forum

OK this is how it works for 95%+ of all votes cast on stories here:

1) The message voters are intending to convey -
5 = I liked your story or you, maybe both
Anything else = I dislike you personally

2) How that message is understood by the author -
5 = You're an amazing author/poet
Anything else = watch your back, you have an enemy hell bent on maliciously destroying your writing career
That sounds like a very useful tool.

Maybe the title of this thread should be changed to something like "A useful tool for proofreading" so that it doesn't get ignored by people thinking it's just another request for an editor
Quote by MonsoonMicky


You can't work on the assumption that a female account is genuine just because it has the sexual orientation set as straight. That's preposterous.

I'm pretty sure there are a fair number of homosexual men on here with a penchant for straight guys using fake female accounts to lure straight men. And they will have their female sexual orientation set as straight.

In fact, there is no way of knowing who is logged into an account at any given time. Several different people could be logging into a single account. It could be a woman one day, then a man the next.

The only way of knowing who is behind an account at any given time is by skyping with them when communicating online.


Who is making the assumption that Genuine = Straight!?

You're making an assumption when you say that there are predatory gay guys here looking for straight guys when all you have is guesswork. Having been here a while you get to realise, there is no "average" lush user - everyone comes here for different reasons. Are there gay guys posing as women - yeah, probably but not in the numbers you think - and nowhere near the number of straight guys posing as bisexual women.

Comfort yourself in the knowledge that most of those guys posing as women are spending most of their lush time talking to other guys posing as women.
Quote by sundancer2004


Exactly, have you ever noticed, in almost, oh hell, in ALL the social webs, when you become interested in someone and sky them if they have or , they almost always come back with: my cam is broken, I Don't have a cam, I'm intending to buy one< well thats a dead giveaway in my mind that they either are A: a man poseing, B: A woman leading youon....... either way, not worth pursuing


Most women who say that are really saying "look, i came here to get off, not to show a complete stranger my tits." A lot of times they would actually be better off saying that rather trying to spare someone's feelings with one of those excuses.

Yes it could be a gay guy but let's face it - there are plenty of bi blokes here that would be far easier and more rewarding hits. Guys generally don't want to put that amount of work in.
Buz is right, the %age of female users here is roughly a third. The numbers get a bit more interesting though when you look at how women use the site - especially by orientation.

42% of the Chat Room Legends who joined Lush in the last 12 months are female. For Authors the figure is even closer to parity - 46%. Between these groups there's a large disparity in orientation.

Exactly half of the female Chat Legends put themselves as Bi-sexual, 1 in 5 said Lesbian and the same number said Straight. Whereas, almost 40% of female Authors who joined the site in the last year are Straight but only 7% are Lesbian.

Of course these figures don't tell you about all the so-called couples accounts or the "I'm married to a wonderful man (whose cock is in the gallery below) and only here to chat with hot women" or people who just like to pretend to be 19 year old bikini models. But of the 4662 females who used the site in the last month most are genuine (to a degree). There's a huge variety of people here and that's a very good thing.
The best rule is simply to not use character thoughts - it's clunky and not very imaginative.

Show your characters thoughts, don't tell them.
As with most mental illnesses - if you're worried you have some kind of disorder, you probably don't (the exception being hypochondria).

Self-diagnosis is always a dangerous path to take; talk with someone you trust, someone who will listen to you. It could be a relative, a teacher or your doctor - just anyone you feel you can share you concerns with.
Quote by Metilda


While it's one thing for a place like Lush to devise it's rules and standards (fully understandable and entirely sensible and within their right to do so, something I support). It's a different kettle of fish to say 'you shouldn't ever write a story that involves __ activity because __ activity is illegal in real life.'

Fiction is fantasy.

While some erotica authors might just strictly write erotica for release at Lush - many don't.

For me, there's absolutely no content that's off the table when it comes to my literary grab bag. I'm creating characters, people, and crafting some intense situations. Sometimes certain intense elements aren't meant to arouse - they're meant to be part of the character's life. Other-times they ARE meant to be arousing and are written for those who find such things appealing. Either way, at least for me, it's intentional and not accidental. Further, my tastes don't condone such activity in real life (that should go without saying).

Further, it's not illegal to write such content. Simply because some other things are 'illegal' in real life doesn't keep authors from considering them as story elements (such as murder and theft - all crimes. Writing them into a story doesn't mean you're condoning it). In my view, erotica on a general basis is no different.

I'm aware of people's sensitivities so when I do write dicey-content I give warnings, etc. However, I've found it extremely easy to stay aware of Lush's rules and not submit stories that Lush deems unacceptable.

But not write it? No - avoiding a story just because it might make some people squirm and not in a good way isn't the way I roll as an author.


That's fine, as long as you're not expecting people to treat the scenario you create as erotica.

You can go into high street book shops and buy novels that will have subjects that are rightly banned here. When those subjects are covered, they are almost universally intended to horrify the reader rather than get them off.

This is a site for writers of erotica, the stories are intended to titillate in some measure. Something you might see as something to shock might just be someone's hottest fantasy. Instead of making some kind of social commentary you've just fed a potential 's imagination and strengthened his warped fantasy. Well done.

Writers of erotica want to make their readers squirm but in a good way.
It's very unlikely to be extra muscle, it's far more likely to be fluid retention

When you exercise (especially if you haven't for a while) the muscles get damaged - that's the soreness you feel. Muscles absorb a lot of fluid when they're repairing themselves causing them to get bigger. (It's also why guys think they can see results after one workout)

This fluid retention is very common among people starting new workouts. It should only be temporary though, so don't lose heart
If you can block story categories I don't see why you shouldn't be able to block authors too.

You could even stretch the block down as far as specific Tags.
The ones you should be concerned about are the ones who take the test and say they definitely AREN'T psychopaths
Editing, punctuation and grammar? Are you sure you're not looking for someone to write your story?
I find it sad that the art of trolling has been reduced to encompass all forms of internet abuse.

The term trolling is borrowed from fishing, where it refers to a form of luring fish. On the internet, few people can do it well and if you can't do it well, you're just an arsehole.

This image sums it up pretty well, there's a blog post to go with it.



blog link: http://icklenellierose.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/abuse-trolling-also-that-twittersilence.html
Quote by elizabethblack


EB: Doesn't this prove my poient? Could it possiiiiibly be thate I did this for assclenching nit-pickars to finde? Releive them of their anguishe and give us spelle chicker.


This is a job for your web browser, not Lush.

Look at your browser settings and adjust them accordingly - you might need to install a plug-in, which will take a couple of clicks to achieve

You'll have spell-check on every site you visit not just Lush
Quote by Dani


The block feature doesn't extend to moderators.

If someone has me blocked, they'll still see my posts. Try it out for yourself.


By the time I see your posts a thread's usually closed anyway
Quote by Dani
Can we please stop with the posturing about who's gonna get their comeuppance or not in regards to the block?

Doesn't it negate the entire purpose of the block if you're just gonna keep making suggestive posts that are obviously directed towards the recipient(s) of your block?

Just enjoy the feature if you so desire and keep it moving.

Going forward, please only post if you have any further issues or suggestions about the new block feature.

No need to turn this thread into yet another train wreck.

Thanks.


What happens if someone has you blocked and can't read your warning?
Quote by ChuckEPoo
After reading this forum I wouldn't as anything new, after finding out there is only programmer that is a volunteer. Big kudos to Gav.


While developers are amazing they should never, ever be left to their own devices.

They need to be proded, poked, nagged and generally harangued to produce what people actually want.

And they love it too so don't feel bad about it.
Quote by ManOfSorrows


Exactly - lay is used of a person or persons in the past tense and of objects in the present tense,

The future tense is more problematical
Psalm 48, verse 8 — I will both lay me down in peace, and sleep: for thou, LORD, only makest me dwell in safety (King James Bible)
Psalm 48, verse 8 — In peace I will both lie down and sleep; for you alone, O LORD, make me dwell in safety. (English Standard Version)

http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/03/lie-or-lay/



For me, both of those are correct, in the first example "me" becomes the object, although I and me are the same thing. In the second the superfluous object ("me") has been removed so the verb reverts to "lie". Would anyone correct "Now I lay me down to sleep"?
It's an interesting point, especially in first person narrative, as to whether or not colloquialisms should be used as a tool for story-telling at the expense of what should be"correct".

Ben Aaronovitch's Rivers of London series are told by the main character, Peter. He almost always uses personal pronouns incorrectly: "Me and Lesley jumped in the jag and sped to the Folly".

The verbal mistake rounds Peter as a character, even if it makes your inner pedant shudder. The way people say things can tell you as much about them as what they actually say. Peter's not well educated, he's not even a very good cop - so he would make grammatical errors like that when telling a story.

By the time the third book comes along Aaronovitch is using this to poke fun at people who think he does it because he can't write: "The school was where countless generations of the Peckwater Estate had been educated, including me and Abigail. Or, as Nightingale insists it should be, Abigail and I." Yes, that's a joke at grammarians and it's hilarious, trust me.
Hmm, not sure about that. It doesn't matter that your head is part of you, it becomes the object. In "I lie on the pillow" - "I" is the thing being lain. In "I lay my head on the pillow" the verb belongs to "my head" or my pants or my soul etc

"Now, I lay my hand on her thigh" works for me.

Of course, none of this would be necessary if people didn't insist on writing in the frankly awful first-person present tense
Quote by nicola
For the latter, it was decided the non-gender related winner, would be:

"Why not say thanks and post something on *membername*’s wall?"

That's what I get paid the big bucks for.



What if that person has disabled profile comments?
The stretching doesn't look very good but then neither does the stacking of irregular shapes.

Cropping and centring the image might be better - there are plenty of jquery plugins that can do this for you. Another alternative might be to use empty 100v100 div tags with the image as a tiled background rather than using an img tag.
Quote by Magical_felix

Not trying to defend OMKN as he is plenty capable of that himself.


*Hugs*
Quote by NymphWriter


You are correct, the apostrophe after in "friend's" is incorrect. It should just say, "... has accepted your friend request." (a minor and easily fixed error.)

As to why the message about "LushMember" accepting your friend request says, "... post something on their wall." is because the computer (and correct me Gav & Nicola if I'm wrong about this) doesn't know if the Member in question is male or female so the correct (or should I say politically correct) neutral pronoun is "their." Now... if it said "there" or "they're" I'd be having my own issues, but that's just the English teacher in me.

Perhaps (and if it's not possible, I'll totally fucking live) there might be a way for the system to know if the registered member has identified as male or female so when these messages say, "Why not say thanks and post something on his wall." or "Why not say thanks an post something on her wall."


Using "their" as a singular pronoun is not correct (politically or otherwise). Common usage allows them to be used where the gender isn't determined - though most style guides will tell you to avoid this where at all possible - but in this case the gender is known. It should be easy enough to check the sex but the code should also check whether you can actually write something on the person's wall.
I get an attack of pedantry every time I get a notification about a friends request being accepted; the two errors in the very short message always stand out.

"Just to let you know LushMember has just accepted your friend's request." - (What did my friend request her to do?)

"Why not say thanks and post something on their wall." - (THEIR wall? Just how many people have accepted?)



(Dani, feel free to delete this post if you're concerned about those of a nervous disposition)
Quote by nicola
And change the existing smaller head and shoulders, to several behind each other, indicating friends?


You're still using pretty much the same motif for two different things. I think you'd be better off ditching the kennel and using something else as a drop down to stories, profile and whatever home page the user has defined - a link that says "Your Lush" maybe. IF you must have a cog there, make sure it's only for changing user settings. Here's an interesting piece on how icons aren't always the right answer http://uxmyths.com/post/715009009/myth-icons-enhance-usability - there's loads of other interesting UXD stuff on there that's well worth at least a scan through.

I'd also ditch the first magnifying glass and re-build the search stories box to allow search for members and authors

I'm pretty sure I know the answer already but have you done any studies of user habits*?

*(no, not those habits)