In a way, Kimmi, my answer is all of the above. And it varies a bit from story to story.
As writers we know a couple of things (how the story came about, and what we did to realize it) that our readers don't understand. So when I evaluate my own stories, they certainly can succeed in terms of what I set out to achieve. This resonates for me:
Quote by cydia
When you've had fun writing it, and then have fun again reading it after a while.
I have a number of stories that I'm thrilled with because of the research or effort or perspective that I have brought out. I often try different things including allusions to other author's work and I have a lot of fun writing like this. And happy memories when I re-read them.
One example is my Noir story: it is modern day Australia grounded in reality and is written in a category that more serious Australian writers than I have publically stated they have struggled to get attention in. I rate it highly and the icing on that cake was, as Carlton said, comments from someone I admire, Jake in this case (The bolding is mine
You do what you do so well here - take the well-worn tropes of a long-standing genre and reshape them in terms of era, sexuality, culture, the works. Simultaneously noir-as-fuck and unlike any noir that's been written before. It bristles with sexiness, intellect, and outrage - has the reader rooting for justice or payback (like Trousseau mentioned), yet delivers a bleak and fearless gut-punch ending.
In my terms this is a huge success, confirmed by some writers I admire.
But as Kistin said:
Quote by kistinspencil
I've written a few stories that I can reread with some real pride of accomplishment, but that is no indication of any sort of greatness outside my own head.
So my reality for the Noir story is that readers generally didn't rate the story up to top ten level in the competition nor RR worthy. I've had more than a few top tens RRs and EP's so in that sense the message I have to make myself accept is that this isn't one of my better stories as independently judged by those who judge more stories than I do.
With most of my stories I do spend time pondering 'why;' not in an aggressive 'why didn't my story do better' way, rather in a, 'what could I have done differently so the stories are better.'
I'm actually trying to do less of this as frankly I wonder if that question will eventually suck the joy out of writing. If the only measure of football success is winning super bowl then disappointment shall surely follow us nearly all of our days. I started writing for stress relief and my significant other will surely tell me to stop if pondering results creates stress.