Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

The Groups discussion thread

last reply
147 replies
10.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
It seems like the "last active" indicator for the groups is off too. Like I just posted but it says the group was last active 13 hours ago
Quote by Liz
Slight tweak:

- When assigning mods to groups you are the 'owner' for, should this perhaps only show members of that group? At the moment you can assign anyone, whether they are a member of the group or not.

If this was a deliberate design feature, could it be set up to send them a PM notification?

Thanks.


You mean I can not just spam Jack? :d/


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Quote by BiMale73


You mean I can not just spam Jack? :d/



Quote by VanGogh


Darling .... don't worry, everyone already knows that you are a bitch.

Its sad on a writing/reading site, you can't read (or perhaps the problem is that you only read what you want and assume the rest is in your bitch-wheelhouse).

Maybe that's part of the bitch DNA ..... unable to read and accept apologies.

If the internet is full of slags, and you view me as one of them - I'm surprised that you felt hurt. Does a bitch feel hurt when someone questions a new thing?

Seriously, maybe you need to re-think your bitchy. That and some tolerance for others. As a mod, I would have thought that would be the first trait Lush Management would have hoped to have had in their Mods that interact on the face of the site.

Have a good day ...

Van

Quote by VanGogh
Absolutely ..... it certainly didn't appear to be a joke to me, but alas .... it's a joke between two buddies.

Got it.

My apologies to you and your team for hurting someone's feelings.

Good luck.

Van/quote]



actually, if anyone is coming off as a bitch here, it's not Liz. Damn. you ever wonder why the mods are occasionally moody? ever wonder what it feels like to try to do your mod thing and get the nasty thrown in your face? ever wonder how it colors your experience when it happens on a constant basis? i really wouldn't worry about someone coming along and trying to sort things out for you anymore, Van. not with that attitude.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

I think being critical and honest about it is a good thing. It's the only way to make things better in my mind. Not making your critique personal or taking it personally is key though. And that can be hard, especially online. Sometimes we just don't try hard enough, and that's just too bad.

Anyway, we have this new feature that, I'm sure, Gav has put a lot of work in. Let's be critical about it, find its weak spots, bugs and (UX) annoyances and see if we can help to improve on them. It's here, now let's make it better!


To be honest it's not entirely clear to me either what it is exactly that the groups will add to Lush and how they will relate to the forum sections, with which they share a lot of functionality of course. Will it increase activity on Lush as likeminded folks will find it easier to find each other, or will it decrease activity cause the site now has more corners and alleys where exciting stuff might be happening without people knowing about it. I assume the former is intended and I guess that Nicola and Gav have a clear vision about how that should work out. Would love to hear some more about that actually. But I probably just have to wait and see how that will turn out to get the concept clear in my head.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Quote by sprite
actually, if anyone is coming off as a bitch here, it's not Liz. Damn. you ever wonder why the mods are occasionally moody? ever wonder what it feels like to try to do your mod thing and get the nasty thrown in your face? ever wonder how it colors your experience when it happens on a constant basis? i really wouldn't worry about someone coming along and trying to sort things out for you anymore, Van. not with that attitude.


Yo, Rachel, you should have read Liz's reply to me, her words was "bitch filter ".

Don't worry. I won't be asking any of you for anything. The way things are here, no one dares to have an opinion or ask a question~ ultimate censorship here, unless you are a mod. Then you can say whatever you want.

Good luck kids.

Van
Can we hide Group Activity in our feeds just like we can do with Forum posts, story comments, votes and so forth?
Quote by VanGogh
Yo, Rachel, you should have read Liz's reply to me, her words was "bitch filter ".

Don't worry. I won't be asking any of you for anything. The way things are here, no one dares to have an opinion or ask a question~ ultimate censorship here, unless you are a mod. Then you can say whatever you want.

Good luck kids.

Van


If you're referring to the posts that are in this thread... then you are being rather thinned skinned. Both Liz and Dani addressed your "concerns" over something you honestly blew out of proportion. Yes, Liz did mention her "bitch filter", but so what? You were being pretty snarky yourself. Liz paraphrased you and also used some humor to try to show you how silly you were being only for you to get your panties in a knot. Sprite's right... it's not Liz who's coming off as a bitch. If anything... Liz addressed you with a lot of class... which is more than can be said for your responses to Liz and Sprite.
Quote by VanGogh


Yo, Rachel, you should have read Liz's reply to me, her words was "bitch filter ".

Don't worry. I won't be asking any of you for anything. The way things are here, no one dares to have an opinion or ask a question~ ultimate censorship here, unless you are a mod. Then you can say whatever you want.

Good luck kids.

Van


yep, i spend all my waking hours thinking of how to censor anyone who's not volunteering their time to make the site run smoother - that's what i'm all about. and i read both her original reply to you and your response, as well. *shrugs* get off your high horse - you decided you wanted to take shots at her for trying to clarify things, then, imo, you shouldn't be surprised when someone takes shots back. btw, censorship would have been easier - i could just delete anyone's opinion that i don't agree with - i choose not to - that doesn't mean i have to stand by and be silent. not sure what your issue is - in the past i've gotten along with you fine, but you seem to be spoiling for a fight lately. best of luck to you, too, kid.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Yikes!

Going forward, if anyone has any personal concerns that have nothing to do with the functionality of the Groups feature, address them via PM.

Please and thank you.

"What is the quality of your intent?" - Thurgood Marshall


^^Didn't that escalate quickly^^

Ok a few quick wins before I start my Friday afternoon beers:


@Liz

Sorted - Can we get the little toolbar (youtube + image links) above the text box on the 'Start New Discussion' page also?
Sorted - Perhaps re-jig the size of the group boxes (div class="group-summary") to show a little more of the summary.


@BiMale73 (I knew I could count in your keen eye)

Sorted - When creating/editing a group the description for the banner image says it should be able to repeat vertically. That should be horizontally (even in Australia).
Sorted - Markdown legend: it says that *text* should become bold, but you need **text** for that. *text* becomes italic.
Sorted - Opening posts: the avatar link lays on top of the reply link below. Will test this in another browser in a sec, cause I use an exotic one at the moment.
Sorted - The description below the textarea for posting a reply says you can use @username to 'quote' someone. I guess that should read 'mention'.


@Mysteria27

Sorted - Is it possible not to see all your friends activity in the groups?


I shall sort out some of the more difficult ones next week.

*group hug*
Quote by gav

*group hug*


Well deserved beers Gav, excellent work.

These Groups are in beta folks. We will brainstorm ideas from the feedback here, look at FB, Goodreads, Reddit and other setups, incorporating the best features as time permits.

Please keep this thread to Groups discussions only. It really doesn't help us on an admin level, having to sift through the banter, to get to the pertinent points.

Thank you!
I have two questions....

1) I've just tried to create a group and add a banner to it. The instructions say the banner should be "a maximum of 100 px high." Mine is 96. When I tried to add the banner I got a message saying the banner should be "exactly 100 px high" and I wasn't able to upload it. Which one is it please? A maximum or exactly?

2) What's the perfect width a banner should be to fill the full width of the screen before it starts to repeat itself?

Thanks Gav xxx
https://www.lushstories.com/stories/fetish/worship-my-bum.aspx
My new story has been awarded the Recommended Read. If you adore a needy bottom and fancy a short, but very naughty read...
Quote by gav
^^Didn't that escalate quickly^^

Ok a few quick wins before I start my Friday afternoon beers:


@Liz

Sorted - Can we get the little toolbar (youtube + image links) above the text box on the 'Start New Discussion' page also?
Sorted - Perhaps re-jig the size of the group boxes (div class="group-summary") to show a little more of the summary.


@BiMale73 (I knew I could count in your keen eye)

Sorted - When creating/editing a group the description for the banner image says it should be able to repeat vertically. That should be horizontally (even in Australia).
Sorted - Markdown legend: it says that *text* should become bold, but you need **text** for that. *text* becomes italic.
Sorted - Opening posts: the avatar link lays on top of the reply link below. Will test this in another browser in a sec, cause I use an exotic one at the moment.
Sorted - The description below the textarea for posting a reply says you can use @username to 'quote' someone. I guess that should read 'mention'.


@Mysteria27

Sorted - Is it possible not to see all your friends activity in the groups?


I shall sort out some of the more difficult ones next week.

*group hug*





You're the best Gav....

Cheers...



Xo
Quote by gav
@Liz

Sorted - Can we get the little toolbar (youtube + image links) above the text box on the 'Start New Discussion' page also?
Sorted - Perhaps re-jig the size of the group boxes (div class="group-summary") to show a little more of the summary.


Thanks, Gav!

Got another one for you:

The 'New Groups' and 'Recently Active Groups' have a lot of overlap at the moment with regards to what information they are showing you. I suspect this will be the case for a while until the rush of new group creations plateaus. Could we replace one of those columns with a 'Most Popular' groups list based on number of members?

Thanks!

L x
Quote by KatieElizabeth
2) What's the perfect width a banner should be to fill the full width of the screen before it starts to repeat itself?


Depends. How wide is your screen?

That is actually the real answer. If someone visits your group using an iPhone4 then the screen width will bw 320px (or 480px in landscape mode), but on my laptop it's for instance 1280px. Lush's content seems to be 990px wide on most pages, except for the forum, so maybe you wanna stick to that, although the header images seem to be left aligned while the content is centered.

@Gav: could you repeat the header image from the center instead from the right? That would probably give a better view.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Either I'm already blocked from most groups (do I get a badge for that?) or the 'join group' link is broken. It links to the group's about page, but without making you (or me at least) join.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Quote by BiMale73
Either I'm already blocked from most groups (do I get a badge for that?) or the 'join group' link is broken. It links to the group's about page, but without making you (or me at least) join.


Oh nevermind. LOL. I should read pages before drawing conclusions.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

It took me a little bit to realize that when a discussion topic is in red it means there is a new post I haven't read yet and once I click on it it turns black the next time I see it until there is another new post. Just wanted to point out that it only changes if you click on the topic. If you click on the "view" link and go back it remains red. Just a little thing but it would improve the functionality of that if both made the color change.
Quote by Magical_felix
It took me a little bit to realize that when a discussion topic is in red it means there is a new post I haven't read yet and once I click on it it turns black the next time I see it until there is another new post. Just wanted to point out that it only changes if you click on the topic. If you click on the "view" link and go back it remains red. Just a little thing but it would improve the functionality of that if both made the color change.


I don't see the colour changing at all. Tried two different browsers. What I see is the topic titles being red in the overview and black on the topic's page. But that stays the same for me no matter what link I use.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Quote by BiMale73


I don't see the colour changing at all. Tried two different browsers. What I see is the topic titles being red in the overview and black on the topic's page. But that stays the same for me no matter what link I use.


Obviously I'm just better than you.
Quote by Magical_felix


Obviously I'm just better than you.


Well... what I'm seeing makes sense.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

It looks like Buz just broke the Music group:



There were more discussions before.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Do we see all of the groups or only the groups that our friends start?

Hugs,
Mysteria
xo
Quote by BiMale73
It looks like Buz just broke the Music group:



There were more discussions before.



Yeah, I can't see any other posts in that group now. Wasn't sure if they were deleted or just poofed or what
Insert something witty here.
Quote by BiMale73
It looks like Buz just broke the Music group:



There were more discussions before.


I've asked Gav to take a look. Very weird.
Quote by Liz
I've asked Gav to take a look. Very weird.


Is it wrong to blame Buz, as his post was the only one showing?

Should be fixed now loops.