Alpha Blonde
A friend of mine always fucked her coworker in the handicap bathroom, sometimes during office hours.
Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Dancing_Doll
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female
Forum
Alpha Blonde
My theory is... if you're seriously concerned that your man is going to attempt to hook up with your friends, then it's time to dump the chump.
A girl shouldn't feel like she's in competition with her friends when it come to her own boyfriend and if she has that kind of mistrust in her relationship she should start wondering more about what he does on guy's nights when she's not around, rather than group outings with her own BFFs.
A girl shouldn't feel like she's in competition with her friends when it come to her own boyfriend and if she has that kind of mistrust in her relationship she should start wondering more about what he does on guy's nights when she's not around, rather than group outings with her own BFFs.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by Nikki703
That is because 99% of porn is made by men for men. If you ever see a porn vid made by a women director, the scenes are much more passionate and take the woman's pleasure into account too.
You should watch some porn by the female director, Mason. You'd probably be shocked. Personally I think there is plenty of passion/pleasure in her films but she definitely takes the more raw route in this interpretation.
It's a little known fact that some of the most extreme porn out there is actually made by female directors. Yeah I know... it surprised me too!
Alpha Blonde
No, it's not degrading.
There are certain cultures that do see it as degrading and prefer not to subject the 'wife' to giving BJ's (better to use the dirty hookers for that kind of thing).
Positions are also not degrading in themselves... it's just a play on dom/sub which every sex act can be labelled as. There is plenty of porn out there where the female is using a guy's face as a fuck-toy as well.
If it's consensual, then it's not degrading. There are many people that enjoy degrading/humiliation overtones as part of role-play but you've got to understand that it's just sexual role-play, not a statement about who those people are in their non-sexual lives.
There are certain cultures that do see it as degrading and prefer not to subject the 'wife' to giving BJ's (better to use the dirty hookers for that kind of thing).
Positions are also not degrading in themselves... it's just a play on dom/sub which every sex act can be labelled as. There is plenty of porn out there where the female is using a guy's face as a fuck-toy as well.
If it's consensual, then it's not degrading. There are many people that enjoy degrading/humiliation overtones as part of role-play but you've got to understand that it's just sexual role-play, not a statement about who those people are in their non-sexual lives.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by ArtMan
Rejection is part of life. No need to dell on it or ask why. just move on. There are always more opportunities and most often better opportunities.
That guy needs to just get over it. He had some issues, serious issues that could require therapy and medication.
Very true.
This whole topic is interesting to me because I did have a similar experience to 'Lauren' after a random first date where I was polite and friendly but I didn't think I was putting off any social cues that I was particularly interested. When he called me afterwards trying to make plans for the next date, I just told him I had fun and it was nice to have drinks with him but I wasn't looking for anything serious. Then he proceeded to start sending me emails (both as himself and posing as someone else) that became progressively more stalkerish and psycho for the next six months, ending in a suicidal "if I can't have you I will kill myself" tragedy-fest.
Now admittedly, I do tend to attract the crazy types for some reason... but... I remember I kept going back over that night and trying to figure out if I had 'misled' him, which he had insinuated I had done. It seems a lot of guys get confused when a girl is being friendly, engaging, fun etc. and not overtly bitchy/quiet on a first date, which I suppose would clearly signal they aren't interested. I'm sure that goes for both genders though. I think that a naturally confident/outgoing (sales-type) personality always has the potential for misinterpretation.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by Loislane
to be honest I think it shows her lack of class that she posted it online or showed it to enough people that it went viral. He is a bit pompous but all she had to do was be honest with the guy.
A few years ago I briefly dated this guy that I just recently discovered has an entire website and facebook page dedicated to his dating/seduction antics, including emails he's sent and the stories he's told to each jilted woman. Now my memories of him were pretty laughable and I admit I used to circulate certain emails from him among my female friends for laughs but I was just shocked that so many women had actually fallen for his lines and seemed so butthurt about it. This guy has been actively trying to get these sites taken down but it sounds like it's a work in progress. It would kind of suck to google your name and see it connected with all these bitter-ex-gf websites. The internet has become a tool for revenge and humiliation.
Edit: sorry I missed the original post by LM. I'm not as thorough in my searches as I used to be.
Alpha Blonde
Instant Solution: Read the person's profile before friending them. 
Alpha Blonde
This guy's stalkerish post-date email has gone viral on the internet over the past week. I think it is hilarious!
And... not a bad lesson in what not-to-do when you get blown off after a first date.
Now I'm going to wager that most guys on Lush will immediately agree that he's nuts, but if you look a little deeper into his whiny message, fess up. Do guys really think this way? Are you putting this much stock into social cues? And, have you ever gotten pissed off when a girl rejected you after you had what you thought was a 'great date'?
------------------
A New York banker penned a 1600-word email after a bad first date - only for the object of his affections to leak it to the internet, where it went viral.
Investment banker Mike went on one date with Lauren - a date she described as "horrific" - and was so put out that she did not call him back that he tracked down her email address.
According to Mike, Lauren played with her hair and made eye contact during the date before telling him at the end of the night: "It was nice to meet you".
Lauren, it seems took a different view.
She posted the email on website Reddit, and gave a brief back story which said: "Friend couldn't make it to philharmonic at last minute so I went alone, met this guy, went on ONE, HORRIFIC date. Then got this..."
READ MIKE'S EMAIL TO LAUREN
Hi Lauren,
I'm disappointed in you. I'm disappointed that I haven't gotten a response to my voicemail and text messages.
FYI, I suggest that you keep in mind that emails sound more impersonal, harsher, and are easier to misinterpret than in-person or phone communication. After all, people can't see someone's body language or tone of voice in an email. I'm not trying to be harsh, patronizing, or insulting in this email. I'm honest and direct by nature, and I'm going to be that way in this email. By the way, I did a Google search, so that's how I came across your email.
I assume that you no longer want to go out with me. (If you do want to go out with me, then you should let me know.) I suggest that you make a sincere apology to me for giving me mixed signals. I feel led on by you.
Things that happened during our date include, but are not limited to, the following:- You played with your hair a lot. A woman playing with her hair is a common sign of flirtation. You can even do a Google search on it. When a woman plays with her hair, she is preening. I've never had a date where a woman played with her hair as much as you did. In addition, it didn't look like you were playing with your hair out of nervousness.
- We had lots of eye contact during our date. On a per-minute basis, I've never had as much eye contact during a date as I did with you.
- You said, 'It was nice to meet you' at the end of our date. A woman could say this statement as a way to show that she isn't interested in seeing a man again or she could mean what she said-that it was nice to meet you. The statement, by itself, is inconclusive.
- We had a nice conversation over dinner. I don't think I'm being delusional in saying this statement.
In my opinion, leading someone on (i.e., giving mixed signals) is impolite and immature. It's bad to do that.
Normally, I would not be asking for information if a woman and I don't go out again after a first date. However, in our case, I'm curious because I think our date went well and that there is a lot of potential for a serious relationship. Of course, it's difficult to predict what would happen, but I think there is a lot of potential for a serious relationship developing between us one day (or least there was before your non-response to my voicemail and text messages).
I think we should go out on a second date. In my opinion, our first date was good enough to lead to a second date.
Why am I writing you? Well, hopefully, we will go out again. Even if we don't, I gain utility from expressing my thoughts to you. In addition, even if you don't want to go out again, I would like to get feedback as to why you wouldn't want to go again. Normally, I wouldn't ask a woman for this type of feedback after a first date, but this is an exception given I think we have a lot of potential.
If you don't want to go again, then apparently you didn't think our first date was good enough to lead to a second date. Dating or a relationship is not a Hollywood movie. It's good to keep that in mind. In general, I thought the date went well and was expecting that we would go out on a second date.
If you're not interested in going out again, then I would have preferred if you hadn't given those mixed signals. I feel led on. We have a number of things in common. I'll name a few things: First, we've both very intelligent. Second, we both like classical music so much that we go to classical music performances by ourselves. In fact, the number one interest that I would want to have in common with a woman with whom I'm in a relationship is a liking of classical music. I wouldn't be seriously involved with a woman if she didn't like classical music. You said that you're planning to go the NY Philharmonic more often in the future. As I said, I go to the NY Philharmonic often. You're very busy. It would be very convenient for you to date me because we have the same interests. We already go to classical music performances by ourselves. If we go to classical music performances together, it wouldn't take any significant additional time on your part.
According to the internet, you're 33 or 32, so, at least from my point of view, we're a good match in terms of age. I could name more things that we have in common, but I'll stop here. I don't understand why you apparently don't want to go out with me again. We have numerous things in common. I assume that you find me physically attractive. If you didn't find me physically attractive, then it would have been irrational for you to go out with me in the first place. After all, our first date was not a blind date.
You already knew what I looked like before our date. Perhaps, you're unimpressed that I manage my family's investments and my own investments. Perhaps, you don't think I have a 'real' job. Well, I've done very well as an investment manager. I've made my parents several millions of dollars. That's real money. That's not monopoly money. In my opinion, if I make real money, it's a real job. Donald Trump's children work for his company. Do they have 'real' jobs? I think so. George Soros' sons help manage their family investments. Do they have 'real' jobs? I think so.
In addition, I'm both a right-brain and left-brain man, given that I'm both an investment manager and a philosopher/writer. That's a unique characteristic; most people aren't like that. I've never been as disappointed and sad about having difficulty about getting a second date as I am with you. I've gone out with a lot of women in my life. (FYI, I'm not a serial dater. Sometimes, I've only gone out with a woman for one date.) People don't grow on trees. I hope you appreciate the potential we have.
Am I sensitive person? Sure, I am. I think it's better to be sensitive than to be insensitive. There are too many impolite, insensitive people in the world.
I suggest that we continue to go out and see what happens. Needless to say, I find you less appealing now (given that you haven't returned my messages) than I did at our first date. However, I would be willing to go out with you again. I'm open minded and flexible and am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I wish you would give me the benefit of the doubt too.
If you don't want to go out again, in my opinion, you would be making a big mistake, perhaps one of the biggest mistakes in your life. If you don't want to go out again, then you should have called to tell me so. Even sending a text message would have been better than nothing. In my opinion, not responding to my messages is impolite, immature, passive aggressive, and cowardly. I spent time, effort, and money meeting you for dinner. Getting back to me in response to my messages would have been a reasonable thing for you to do. In addition, you arrived about 30 minutes late for our date. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if a man showed up thirty minutes late for a first date with you.
If you're concerned that you will hurt my feelings by providing specific information about why you don't want to go with me again, well, my feelings are already hurt. I'm sad and disappointed about this situation. If you give information, at least I can understand the situation better. I might even learn something that is beneficial.
If you don't want to go out again, that I request that you call me and make a sincere apology for leading me on (i.e., giving me mixed signals). In my opinion, you shouldn't act that way toward a man and then not go out with him again. It's bad to play with your hair so much and make so much eye contact if you're not interested in going out with me again. I have tried to write this email well, but it's not perfect. Again, I'm not trying to be harsh, insulting, patronizing, etc. I'm disappointed, sad, etc.
I would like to talk to you on the phone. I hope you will call me back at xxx-xxx-xxxx (if it's inconvenient for you to talk on the phone when you read this email, you can let me know via email that you are willing to talk on the phone and I'll call you). If you get my voicemail, you can a leave a message and I can call you back. Even if you don't want to go out again, I would appreciate it if you give me the courtesy of calling me and talking to me. Yes, you might say things that hurt me, but my feelings are already hurt.
Sending me an email response (instead of talking on the phone) would better than no response at all, but I think it would be better to talk on the phone. Email communication has too much potential for misinterpretation, etc.
Best, Mike
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/offbeat/12293937/ny-banker-s-1600-word-bad-date-screed/
And... not a bad lesson in what not-to-do when you get blown off after a first date.
Now I'm going to wager that most guys on Lush will immediately agree that he's nuts, but if you look a little deeper into his whiny message, fess up. Do guys really think this way? Are you putting this much stock into social cues? And, have you ever gotten pissed off when a girl rejected you after you had what you thought was a 'great date'?
------------------
A New York banker penned a 1600-word email after a bad first date - only for the object of his affections to leak it to the internet, where it went viral.
Investment banker Mike went on one date with Lauren - a date she described as "horrific" - and was so put out that she did not call him back that he tracked down her email address.
According to Mike, Lauren played with her hair and made eye contact during the date before telling him at the end of the night: "It was nice to meet you".
Lauren, it seems took a different view.
She posted the email on website Reddit, and gave a brief back story which said: "Friend couldn't make it to philharmonic at last minute so I went alone, met this guy, went on ONE, HORRIFIC date. Then got this..."
READ MIKE'S EMAIL TO LAUREN
Hi Lauren,
I'm disappointed in you. I'm disappointed that I haven't gotten a response to my voicemail and text messages.
FYI, I suggest that you keep in mind that emails sound more impersonal, harsher, and are easier to misinterpret than in-person or phone communication. After all, people can't see someone's body language or tone of voice in an email. I'm not trying to be harsh, patronizing, or insulting in this email. I'm honest and direct by nature, and I'm going to be that way in this email. By the way, I did a Google search, so that's how I came across your email.
I assume that you no longer want to go out with me. (If you do want to go out with me, then you should let me know.) I suggest that you make a sincere apology to me for giving me mixed signals. I feel led on by you.
Things that happened during our date include, but are not limited to, the following:- You played with your hair a lot. A woman playing with her hair is a common sign of flirtation. You can even do a Google search on it. When a woman plays with her hair, she is preening. I've never had a date where a woman played with her hair as much as you did. In addition, it didn't look like you were playing with your hair out of nervousness.
- We had lots of eye contact during our date. On a per-minute basis, I've never had as much eye contact during a date as I did with you.
- You said, 'It was nice to meet you' at the end of our date. A woman could say this statement as a way to show that she isn't interested in seeing a man again or she could mean what she said-that it was nice to meet you. The statement, by itself, is inconclusive.
- We had a nice conversation over dinner. I don't think I'm being delusional in saying this statement.
In my opinion, leading someone on (i.e., giving mixed signals) is impolite and immature. It's bad to do that.
Normally, I would not be asking for information if a woman and I don't go out again after a first date. However, in our case, I'm curious because I think our date went well and that there is a lot of potential for a serious relationship. Of course, it's difficult to predict what would happen, but I think there is a lot of potential for a serious relationship developing between us one day (or least there was before your non-response to my voicemail and text messages).
I think we should go out on a second date. In my opinion, our first date was good enough to lead to a second date.
Why am I writing you? Well, hopefully, we will go out again. Even if we don't, I gain utility from expressing my thoughts to you. In addition, even if you don't want to go out again, I would like to get feedback as to why you wouldn't want to go again. Normally, I wouldn't ask a woman for this type of feedback after a first date, but this is an exception given I think we have a lot of potential.
If you don't want to go again, then apparently you didn't think our first date was good enough to lead to a second date. Dating or a relationship is not a Hollywood movie. It's good to keep that in mind. In general, I thought the date went well and was expecting that we would go out on a second date.
If you're not interested in going out again, then I would have preferred if you hadn't given those mixed signals. I feel led on. We have a number of things in common. I'll name a few things: First, we've both very intelligent. Second, we both like classical music so much that we go to classical music performances by ourselves. In fact, the number one interest that I would want to have in common with a woman with whom I'm in a relationship is a liking of classical music. I wouldn't be seriously involved with a woman if she didn't like classical music. You said that you're planning to go the NY Philharmonic more often in the future. As I said, I go to the NY Philharmonic often. You're very busy. It would be very convenient for you to date me because we have the same interests. We already go to classical music performances by ourselves. If we go to classical music performances together, it wouldn't take any significant additional time on your part.
According to the internet, you're 33 or 32, so, at least from my point of view, we're a good match in terms of age. I could name more things that we have in common, but I'll stop here. I don't understand why you apparently don't want to go out with me again. We have numerous things in common. I assume that you find me physically attractive. If you didn't find me physically attractive, then it would have been irrational for you to go out with me in the first place. After all, our first date was not a blind date.
You already knew what I looked like before our date. Perhaps, you're unimpressed that I manage my family's investments and my own investments. Perhaps, you don't think I have a 'real' job. Well, I've done very well as an investment manager. I've made my parents several millions of dollars. That's real money. That's not monopoly money. In my opinion, if I make real money, it's a real job. Donald Trump's children work for his company. Do they have 'real' jobs? I think so. George Soros' sons help manage their family investments. Do they have 'real' jobs? I think so.
In addition, I'm both a right-brain and left-brain man, given that I'm both an investment manager and a philosopher/writer. That's a unique characteristic; most people aren't like that. I've never been as disappointed and sad about having difficulty about getting a second date as I am with you. I've gone out with a lot of women in my life. (FYI, I'm not a serial dater. Sometimes, I've only gone out with a woman for one date.) People don't grow on trees. I hope you appreciate the potential we have.
Am I sensitive person? Sure, I am. I think it's better to be sensitive than to be insensitive. There are too many impolite, insensitive people in the world.
I suggest that we continue to go out and see what happens. Needless to say, I find you less appealing now (given that you haven't returned my messages) than I did at our first date. However, I would be willing to go out with you again. I'm open minded and flexible and am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I wish you would give me the benefit of the doubt too.
If you don't want to go out again, in my opinion, you would be making a big mistake, perhaps one of the biggest mistakes in your life. If you don't want to go out again, then you should have called to tell me so. Even sending a text message would have been better than nothing. In my opinion, not responding to my messages is impolite, immature, passive aggressive, and cowardly. I spent time, effort, and money meeting you for dinner. Getting back to me in response to my messages would have been a reasonable thing for you to do. In addition, you arrived about 30 minutes late for our date. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if a man showed up thirty minutes late for a first date with you.
If you're concerned that you will hurt my feelings by providing specific information about why you don't want to go with me again, well, my feelings are already hurt. I'm sad and disappointed about this situation. If you give information, at least I can understand the situation better. I might even learn something that is beneficial.
If you don't want to go out again, that I request that you call me and make a sincere apology for leading me on (i.e., giving me mixed signals). In my opinion, you shouldn't act that way toward a man and then not go out with him again. It's bad to play with your hair so much and make so much eye contact if you're not interested in going out with me again. I have tried to write this email well, but it's not perfect. Again, I'm not trying to be harsh, insulting, patronizing, etc. I'm disappointed, sad, etc.
I would like to talk to you on the phone. I hope you will call me back at xxx-xxx-xxxx (if it's inconvenient for you to talk on the phone when you read this email, you can let me know via email that you are willing to talk on the phone and I'll call you). If you get my voicemail, you can a leave a message and I can call you back. Even if you don't want to go out again, I would appreciate it if you give me the courtesy of calling me and talking to me. Yes, you might say things that hurt me, but my feelings are already hurt.
Sending me an email response (instead of talking on the phone) would better than no response at all, but I think it would be better to talk on the phone. Email communication has too much potential for misinterpretation, etc.
Best, Mike
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/offbeat/12293937/ny-banker-s-1600-word-bad-date-screed/
Alpha Blonde
Beatrix Kiddo in the Kill Bill series.
Another character I've always loved is Alice Ayres/Jane Jones in the movie Closer (played by Natalie Portman).
Another character I've always loved is Alice Ayres/Jane Jones in the movie Closer (played by Natalie Portman).
Alpha Blonde
Quote by snoopnc
In fact, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists say that a clean vagina will have a mild stench
Hmm... somehow I wouldn't think to put the words "mild" and "stench" next to each other.
Pretty much everything we do is 'unnatural' and moderately bad for our health... from waxing, tattoo'ing, smoking, drinking etc. It's all down to personal choice and level of risk we're willing to take on.
If you go to a proper, reputable salon, I don't think there is much to worry about in terms of infection or bacterial doom and gloom. You run similar risks going to a crappy nail salon or unclean 'spa'.
And I have never heard of the ridiculous theory that a full bush helps prevent herpes and STIs. If anything, hair helps to slough off and retain shedding viral cells from a herpes-infected partner. Other STIs are because of an internal body fluid exchange, so I don't know what outer hair is doing for prevention there either.
As much as some people want the full-bush to become trendy again because it's zero maintenance... I really don't think it's ever going to be coming back in style... unless maybe as a specialty fetish.
Alpha Blonde
Loved the sound effects of the lightning. Great voice. I was going to say at the beginning to slow down the reading-speed a little but you totally settled into it as you got into the story and it was really well done.
Definite encore is warranted!
Definite encore is warranted!
Alpha Blonde
I'll formally chime in on this one:
I love Jen for the reasons mentioned... she's accessible, classy, ageing beautifully etc but... I honestly think the light went out in her eyes several years ago. Maybe it's the media attention of the Pitt/Jolie saga that's just worn out her soul or something. To me she just looks like the best friend or the girl you want to route for but... not sure about the idea of 'all time sex appeal'. To me that's something that requires a certain confidence and quality you can't quite pinpoint but just makes the person someone you wouldn't be able to take your eyes off in a crowded room.
I am a Jolie fan because she has the qualities I mentioned above and not enough people give her credit for her humanitarian efforts that supercede every other woman in hollywood, in my opinion. But... as far as the public persona she projects, it's quite inaccessible and intimidating to most, so I can see why she wouldn't top this list, but she would definitely be in my top five. Let's face it... when it comes to sex, she would scare the hell out of most men (which explains the ridiculous inclusion of a mindless fuck-friendly type like Britney Spears in the Top Five... gaak!).
I'd give the title to Brigitte Bardot, no question.
I love Jen for the reasons mentioned... she's accessible, classy, ageing beautifully etc but... I honestly think the light went out in her eyes several years ago. Maybe it's the media attention of the Pitt/Jolie saga that's just worn out her soul or something. To me she just looks like the best friend or the girl you want to route for but... not sure about the idea of 'all time sex appeal'. To me that's something that requires a certain confidence and quality you can't quite pinpoint but just makes the person someone you wouldn't be able to take your eyes off in a crowded room.
I am a Jolie fan because she has the qualities I mentioned above and not enough people give her credit for her humanitarian efforts that supercede every other woman in hollywood, in my opinion. But... as far as the public persona she projects, it's quite inaccessible and intimidating to most, so I can see why she wouldn't top this list, but she would definitely be in my top five. Let's face it... when it comes to sex, she would scare the hell out of most men (which explains the ridiculous inclusion of a mindless fuck-friendly type like Britney Spears in the Top Five... gaak!).
I'd give the title to Brigitte Bardot, no question.
Alpha Blonde
So... Jennifer Aniston was just named 'The Sexiest Woman of ALL TIME'... *cough*... What?!
OK, I think Jen is fab, but not sure she quite deserves this coveted title. So what do you Lushies think? Does sex appeal mean you have to have the 'total package' (looks, brains, funny, good personality), or is "sexiest woman" more about who gets the blood flowing? If you think this was a mistake, who would you have picked for this title?
For reference, the Top 100 women can be found here:
http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/hottest-women-all-time
Forget that “Sexiest Woman Alive” nonsense. Jennifer Aniston has been named “Sexiest Woman of All Time” by readers of Men’s Health magazine.
In their explanation of why the 42-year-old “Horrible Bosses” star topped the poll, the editors of Men’s Health wrote, “’Funny is sexy, and Jennifer Aniston is funny. Her down-to-earth persona makes her seem attainable, and anyone who’s seen her in ’Office Space’ has to admit she makes even pieces of flair look good.”
Those with a stake in Team Aniston in the Aniston vs. Angelina Jolie war that has raged for nearly six years will be pleased to know that the competition wasn’t even close this time: Jolie is No. 10 on the list.
Aniston also beat out Raquel Welch, Marilyn Monroe, Britney Spears, Madonna, Ursula Andress, Bettie Page, Pamela Anderson and Jane Fonda.
Rounding out the top five are Madonna, Britney Spears, Marilyn Monroe and Raquel Welch.
Aniston, 42, had a hard time choosing whom she thought deserves the title. "It's a tie between Bridgitte Bardot and Gloria Steinem," she said. "But if I had to choose one, I'd say Gloria because, well, she's the full package. That's sexy."
As for what makes a guy sexy, the actress said, "Sexiest thing about a man -- other than abs -- is if he can make me laugh, has compassion, kindness, and an accurately sized ego."
OK, I think Jen is fab, but not sure she quite deserves this coveted title. So what do you Lushies think? Does sex appeal mean you have to have the 'total package' (looks, brains, funny, good personality), or is "sexiest woman" more about who gets the blood flowing? If you think this was a mistake, who would you have picked for this title?
For reference, the Top 100 women can be found here:
http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/hottest-women-all-time
Forget that “Sexiest Woman Alive” nonsense. Jennifer Aniston has been named “Sexiest Woman of All Time” by readers of Men’s Health magazine.
In their explanation of why the 42-year-old “Horrible Bosses” star topped the poll, the editors of Men’s Health wrote, “’Funny is sexy, and Jennifer Aniston is funny. Her down-to-earth persona makes her seem attainable, and anyone who’s seen her in ’Office Space’ has to admit she makes even pieces of flair look good.”
Those with a stake in Team Aniston in the Aniston vs. Angelina Jolie war that has raged for nearly six years will be pleased to know that the competition wasn’t even close this time: Jolie is No. 10 on the list.
Aniston also beat out Raquel Welch, Marilyn Monroe, Britney Spears, Madonna, Ursula Andress, Bettie Page, Pamela Anderson and Jane Fonda.
Rounding out the top five are Madonna, Britney Spears, Marilyn Monroe and Raquel Welch.
Aniston, 42, had a hard time choosing whom she thought deserves the title. "It's a tie between Bridgitte Bardot and Gloria Steinem," she said. "But if I had to choose one, I'd say Gloria because, well, she's the full package. That's sexy."
As for what makes a guy sexy, the actress said, "Sexiest thing about a man -- other than abs -- is if he can make me laugh, has compassion, kindness, and an accurately sized ego."
Alpha Blonde
I do on rare occasion to add a bit of variety but I'm really picky with my gay porn.
Definitely the masculine, athletic bodies are a must, not the femme guys. Even more so if it seems more like a 'straight' actor doing the gay for pay thing. That increases the kink factor.
As well, sometimes I'm just curious about the production type and story lines of different styles of porn, not out of arousal... just cause I want to see, well... what goes on in that world! This might explain why it feels like I've seen a lot of bizarre porn.
That said, it's really a hit-or-miss genre for me so I don't watch it regularly.
Definitely the masculine, athletic bodies are a must, not the femme guys. Even more so if it seems more like a 'straight' actor doing the gay for pay thing. That increases the kink factor.
As well, sometimes I'm just curious about the production type and story lines of different styles of porn, not out of arousal... just cause I want to see, well... what goes on in that world! This might explain why it feels like I've seen a lot of bizarre porn.
That said, it's really a hit-or-miss genre for me so I don't watch it regularly.
Alpha Blonde
If you have a meaningful connection with someone, it should go beyond Lush.
For the more casual 'online friends', it's just the way life evolves... and not that different than real life in some ways. People's lives cross and uncross as life changes over time. It's natural.
For the more casual 'online friends', it's just the way life evolves... and not that different than real life in some ways. People's lives cross and uncross as life changes over time. It's natural.
Alpha Blonde
For me... 20 minutes MAX.
With a vibrator it's way less. And if it's a Lelo Soraya, I can do it in under a minute if I'm already horny.
I don't think there are any tips and tricks... personally I've always believed that the orgasm has always involved the mind more than the body. Mental stimulation (porn, reading a story, going through your own sexual memory-vault of dirty moments) all start to tip you to the edge.
If you're distracted or your mind is on something else (ie. something non-sexual), it's going to take way longer to orgasm regardless of what you're doing to yourself physically.
With a vibrator it's way less. And if it's a Lelo Soraya, I can do it in under a minute if I'm already horny.
I don't think there are any tips and tricks... personally I've always believed that the orgasm has always involved the mind more than the body. Mental stimulation (porn, reading a story, going through your own sexual memory-vault of dirty moments) all start to tip you to the edge.
If you're distracted or your mind is on something else (ie. something non-sexual), it's going to take way longer to orgasm regardless of what you're doing to yourself physically.
Alpha Blonde
Faux Lesbian Guide:
1. Banner in-all-caps "NO MEN".
2. A full gallery of nude and semi-nude photos claiming to be them. Usually they are all headless with varying breast/nipple sizes, a self-pic in the mirror collection where you see 'she' is often using a number of different kinds of camera-phones in many of the pics OR it's a gallery-set of 12 pics of the same girl which all appear to be taken at the same time in a slow-undress in amazingly professional lighting.
3. This person doesn't write stories, nor do they vote/comment on any stories on the site. In fact the 'stories' bit in the url domain name goes mostly unacknowledged.
4. Their status updates declare that they are constantly wet and horny for other girls and tease with extravagant stories of how they just had an all-female orgy the night before or they sat masturbating on their female boss's desk that day wearing a see-through shirt and no panties.
5. They spend a lot of time commenting on other girl's photos on the site in an overly "I want to suck your dripping pussy" kind of way when they don't even know them.
I think those are the beginner's basics.
I am not looking for hook-ups, but I'm here to write, so I don't have any "no men, no lesbians, no transsexuals" rules governing my profile. I just judge on a person-by-person basis. It works pretty smoothly 95% of the time. People should be more concerned with the quality of the person than by their gender or sexual identification when it comes to building a friend list, in my opinion.
1. Banner in-all-caps "NO MEN".
2. A full gallery of nude and semi-nude photos claiming to be them. Usually they are all headless with varying breast/nipple sizes, a self-pic in the mirror collection where you see 'she' is often using a number of different kinds of camera-phones in many of the pics OR it's a gallery-set of 12 pics of the same girl which all appear to be taken at the same time in a slow-undress in amazingly professional lighting.
3. This person doesn't write stories, nor do they vote/comment on any stories on the site. In fact the 'stories' bit in the url domain name goes mostly unacknowledged.
4. Their status updates declare that they are constantly wet and horny for other girls and tease with extravagant stories of how they just had an all-female orgy the night before or they sat masturbating on their female boss's desk that day wearing a see-through shirt and no panties.
5. They spend a lot of time commenting on other girl's photos on the site in an overly "I want to suck your dripping pussy" kind of way when they don't even know them.
I think those are the beginner's basics.
I am not looking for hook-ups, but I'm here to write, so I don't have any "no men, no lesbians, no transsexuals" rules governing my profile. I just judge on a person-by-person basis. It works pretty smoothly 95% of the time. People should be more concerned with the quality of the person than by their gender or sexual identification when it comes to building a friend list, in my opinion.
Alpha Blonde
The concept of 'fine art' is completely subjective. In the early days of Picasso, his work was considered 'junk' by many. It depends on what you view art as. Most people feel comfortable classifying 'fine art' based on bourgeois concepts only after artists are dead and catalogued. Many modern artists are overlooked because a large part of society classifies art based on what they learn it's supposed to look like, rather than what it makes you feel.
In my opinion Tattoo artists create urban art. Not all of them. Some can reproduce and replicate very well, but if you see what an elite level tattoo artist produces, it can be quite evocative and complex... more so when they are doing interpretations or creating designs that can exist together harmoniously (like on a tattoo sleeve or a large space).
Unfortunately most clients walk in with very specific ideas for their tattoos so most artists are confined by their demands. But many dedicated tattoo artists don't just work with ink... they use other mediums for their art. I think tattooing is a limited genre in itself.
Anyway... I think some pieces are extraordinarily beautiful.
I actually just got my first tattoo today (just something small and meaningful to me). I think the meaning behind people's tattoos are part of their beauty.
I love when people have a story behind their ink. And conversely I feel sorry for all those people that succumbed to the dolphin, starburst and barb wire around the bicep trends of the past.
In my opinion Tattoo artists create urban art. Not all of them. Some can reproduce and replicate very well, but if you see what an elite level tattoo artist produces, it can be quite evocative and complex... more so when they are doing interpretations or creating designs that can exist together harmoniously (like on a tattoo sleeve or a large space).
Unfortunately most clients walk in with very specific ideas for their tattoos so most artists are confined by their demands. But many dedicated tattoo artists don't just work with ink... they use other mediums for their art. I think tattooing is a limited genre in itself.
Anyway... I think some pieces are extraordinarily beautiful.
I actually just got my first tattoo today (just something small and meaningful to me). I think the meaning behind people's tattoos are part of their beauty.
I love when people have a story behind their ink. And conversely I feel sorry for all those people that succumbed to the dolphin, starburst and barb wire around the bicep trends of the past.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by FtLMale
Can you walk it on a leash?
It it house broken?
I want one so bad!
The new designer pet! Where is Paris Hilton?
Everything looks cuter with a diamond collar and a pink leash.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by [url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/8930070/Worlds-biggest-insect-is-so-huge-it-eats-carrots.html
Giant Insect[/url]]
Former park ranger Mark, 53, discovered the giant weta up a tree and his real life Bug's Bunny has now been declared the largest ever found.
He came across the cricket-like creature, which has a wing span of seven inches, after two days of searching on a tiny island. The creepy crawly is only found on Little Barrier Island, in New Zealand. The species were wiped off the mainland by rats accidentally introduced by Europeans.
After Mark found the female weta he fed it the carrot before putting it back where he found her. Mark, 53, said: "Three of us walked the trails of this small island for two nights scanning the vegetation for a giant weta.
"We spent many hours with no luck finding any at all, before we saw her up in a tree. The giant weta is the largest insect in the world, and this is the biggest one ever found, she weighs the equivalent to three mice. She enjoyed the carrot so much she seemed to ignore the fact she was resting on our hands and carried on munching away. She would have finished the carrot very quickly, but this is an extremely endangered species and we didn't want to risk indigestion. After she had chewed a little I took this picture and we put her right back where we found her."
Mark, from Colorado, America, added: "We bug lovers hear a lot of people who think insects are inferior in some way because of their size, so it was great to see such a big insect. This became all the more amazing when we realized that this was the largest insect recorded."
Yikes!
Alpha Blonde
As Yahtzee said, I do have twitter... I don't always use it that regularly but sometimes I get more into it than others. I tweet random things, my writing, and blog posts.
I use it professionally (following/networking with writers/publishers) but also personally, tweeting about things that interest me outside of the erotica world.
I do follow-back if the person seems legit and not a tweet-bot or a total creeper.
I enjoy following the celebs, pornstars, sportsguys and interesting personalities out in twitterville. I've some 'interesting' experiences come out of it... lol
@AshleighLake
I use it professionally (following/networking with writers/publishers) but also personally, tweeting about things that interest me outside of the erotica world.
I do follow-back if the person seems legit and not a tweet-bot or a total creeper.
I enjoy following the celebs, pornstars, sportsguys and interesting personalities out in twitterville. I've some 'interesting' experiences come out of it... lol
@AshleighLake
Alpha Blonde
Quote by 321ZoeF
Thanks for all your replies,I think I better keep my feelings to myself from now on,oh and I am 100% female for those who think I'm posing as a guy,thanks for your comments anyway.
Your fetish is more than acceptable here.
When you've started multiple current threads on the same topic in various places on the forum, it can get repetitive for regular members. The best thing to do is to create one thread and if it goes stale and sinks several pages back over time, you can always "bump" it up to the top if you still feel there is more to say on the topic or want to express yourself further.
I'm sure there's more to your sexuality than just 'nipple rubbing', so feel free to chime in on other threads and topics too.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by lafayettemister
I've been waiting for you to use that molding kit I sent you. I need a prototype Dancing_Doll pussy to try out before I begin sellling it to all the guys on Lush. Hurry up already. And I'll up my offer. I'll give you 2% of the proceeds from the sell of your own pussy. That's twice my original offer!
The mold kits they sell on the market only allow for the exterior shape to be created, so there is no internal play ability.
I probably shouldn't know that fact, should I...
The mold kits work better on guys. I saw one where you can even make a candle in the exact shape of your dick. I always thought that would set the perfect seduction scene on a date. There's nothing like setting the mood than lighting up your very own cock-candle.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by BangTidy
Yes I agree......or some guy posing as a breast adoring lesbian......
That doesn't happen here on Lush, does it??
Exactly.
Alpha Blonde
I think there is a double-standard in general. A lot of guys won't admit to owning toys or they are too embarrassed to go into a store and buy them for themselves. I'm sure there are many toy-owning men out there that hide them when a new girl comes into the picture, just the same as they hide the raunchy porn on their computers on secret hard drives.
Maybe they feel like the concept of needing any extra stimulation makes them seem less "manly" and "virile" or that certain toys will lead someone to think they are "gay."
The image of a woman writhing in ecstasy on a bed with a beautifully shaped toy while she brings herself to orgasm is a culturally-acceptable, sensual and attractive thing. Lots of porn is based on these scenarios alone.
There's a whole lot less porn out there feature a guy dildo'ing his ass of jacking his dick into a fleshlight tube or fucking a rubber-doll.
The image of the woman masturbating with a toy seems to connote unbridled lust and sexual libido where she just can't get enough and is extremely in tune with the pleasures of her body... The image of the guy masturbating seems to connote a desperate guy jerking off by pretending to be fucking a pussy because he can't get a real woman. These concepts are wrong, but I think they are conservatively held by many.
Personally I am in favour of toys for all, to be used separately and as couples. I'm not intimidated by the concept at all. Quite the opposite, I have bought male-toys before as gifts. I like to watch and play too. For me, it's all about pleasure. Fuck the stereotypes and hang-ups.
Maybe they feel like the concept of needing any extra stimulation makes them seem less "manly" and "virile" or that certain toys will lead someone to think they are "gay."
The image of a woman writhing in ecstasy on a bed with a beautifully shaped toy while she brings herself to orgasm is a culturally-acceptable, sensual and attractive thing. Lots of porn is based on these scenarios alone.
There's a whole lot less porn out there feature a guy dildo'ing his ass of jacking his dick into a fleshlight tube or fucking a rubber-doll.
The image of the woman masturbating with a toy seems to connote unbridled lust and sexual libido where she just can't get enough and is extremely in tune with the pleasures of her body... The image of the guy masturbating seems to connote a desperate guy jerking off by pretending to be fucking a pussy because he can't get a real woman. These concepts are wrong, but I think they are conservatively held by many.
Personally I am in favour of toys for all, to be used separately and as couples. I'm not intimidated by the concept at all. Quite the opposite, I have bought male-toys before as gifts. I like to watch and play too. For me, it's all about pleasure. Fuck the stereotypes and hang-ups.
Alpha Blonde
Quote by Yahtzee
from another thread, our resident expert on toys ... Dancing_Doll:
http://www.lushstories.com/forum/yaf_postst19678_Breaking-Vibrators-Quickly.aspx
(the thread has other interesting information you may want to check out)
Also suggested by DD was the incredible We-Vibe. http://we-vibe.com/
have fun!!
Thanks Yahtzee... lol... I'm still waiting for the company to set up an office in Canada so I can campaign to be the real Toy Master for a living. *taps foot impatiently*
Alpha Blonde
I find that the breast-to-breast thing is more of a visual construct that men seem to enjoy and fascinate over... kind of like a porn image that guys want to imagine is immensely stimulating and exciting to women.
Truth is... it doesn't do much for most women in terms of sexual stimulation.
But yeah, girls can fake it on a porn vid or a sweaty dancefloor to get the attention of simple-minded gawking men.
Truth is... it doesn't do much for most women in terms of sexual stimulation.
But yeah, girls can fake it on a porn vid or a sweaty dancefloor to get the attention of simple-minded gawking men.
