No... I have had long blonde hair since I was a kid... guys usually go to the opposite extreme, and try to make me promise to never cut it. I assume if he met me looking a certain way, then he's not going to spring some sudden, "hey I actually prefer short-haired brunettes, so can you change for me?" kind of statement.
If someone has a fetish for a particular physical trait (ie. short hair, redheads, big breasts etc), then they should have sought out someone who looked like that in the first place.
I'd wear a wig though for sex-roleplay or fun, since I like doing that anyway. But I wouldn't make any permanent decisions about my appearance that I wasn't comfortable with.
Go for it!
I've been brazilian waxing for years now, and it's not as painful as everyone thinks (well, as long as you have some sort of pain threshold). You can take two Advils about an hour hour before your appointment to reduce pain if you want. Definitely go to a professional for this. They do it so fast, the whole thing is over with before you know it. I love the results.
A guy that's too big is such a sexual liability for a girl.
Who wants that teeth clenching, and squirming to ease penetration in those certain positions that are just too painful to attempt with an anaconda-sized guy. A cervix pounding sounds great in theory (or in an erotic story), but in reality, it hurts like hell.
I have one friend who has an "extra-large" sized boyfriend, and she will only have sex with him once a week, because she has to "work herself up to it" because it hurts too much. So that usually means being drunk or on recreational drugs on the weekend. If you need alcohol or drugs to comfortably fuck your boyfriend, then he's probably too big... ugh!
Anyway... I think most women will agree that average sized is best. It's so much more versatile for sex.
Actually I'm thinking the term "nice guy" and "bad boy" are more outdated concepts. I think after reading everyone's responses and knowing that everyone has a different definition for these stereotypes... I think it's easier summed up as the alpha-male versus beta-male. And as females, most of us are instinctively drawn to the alpha male type... which is definitely the better way of defining the description Rocco gave (of the guy in the bar that everyone either knows, or wants to know).
The old way of looking at a bad-boy (as an unemployed, dirty-haired artist or rebel without a cause type who refuses to follow the rules) is probably a whole other cultural sub-genre, and is probably not what most women are thinking of when we say "bad boy". It's not really "clean" versus "dirty". We're more looking for "edge" rather than a guy with criminal history, poor hygiene habits, or one who completely rejects society's rules.
So... I do think it's more about the allure of the alpha male (who isn't all nice, nor all bad), but has the drive and confidence to get what he wants. As I'm reading what we've all written, the one-dimensional, wimpy, ass-kissing or boring character we've all assigned as the "nice guy" is actually just a beta-male.
I think when it comes down to it, this is just another example of our biological inclinations at work... females will always be drawn to the alphas.
If the creators of South Park haven't jumped all over this, then the need to immediately. Bear would be an awesome episode.
I still fondly remember the episodes featuring "Sexual Harassment Panda" and NAMBLA.
Seriously though... if these guys are wanting to advertise themselves as Pedos by using these bumper stickers, then let them. At least people will know who to inflict random acts of violence against when/if the urge strikes.
From what I read in the article, the renowned scientists of Cosmo magazine have equated being better in bed to how long a guy can last.
Maybe it's because a fat guy isn't as energetic when he's having sex, or making the woman do more of the work, so things are slowed down and he's able to hold off for longer?
Either way, I would never say that a guy that can last longer means he is better in bed.
My ex-bf used to like the idea of me fooling around with girls, or kissing girls and seemed to encourage the idea. One night at a massive club party, a hot friend of mine (primarily straight, she just liked to play with girls on the side), made out with me in front of him. He got pissed off. I had another friend who also would come onto me during girls nights or if our group of friends was out and partying. This also pissed him off.
He then told me that if any of my friends tries to come onto me in the future, I should just say that "I am not allowed".
I didn't understand the difference at the time, because he otherwise was encouraging of it, but it seemed like it had to be on his terms, and only with girls that he "okayed", and preferably in his presence... otherwise he viewed it as "cheating".
I also realized that it was probably more based on him being able to be turned on, imagining he might have a shot at a threesome... which with my friends (who were the girlfriends of his buddies) was never going to happen. He may have also disliked the possible emotional element involved... that these were girls I was already attached to on a friendship basis... which maybe made a sexual interaction more threatening than erotic to him.
