Last night's show on Megalodon had me hooked until I realized it was a fake mockumentary. Interesting concept - kind of like a 'found footage' thing with fake marine biologists, a tragedy of screaming victims, doctored unearthed photos from the Nazis of a ginormous shark and a fake scientific quest. This actually could have been an interesting shark movie if there had been character development and a little more glossing. Twitter was blowing up though - people are pissed about it. And you know a bunch of people watching it probably thought it was real because it was on Discovery.
I remember reading somewhere that once a guy is over 40, the risks for certain genetic mutations begin to increase and there's more links to issues like autism and schizophrenia. Eggs and sperm start to go bad with age, so over 65+ would be a 'no' from me. And that's besides the point that the average lifespan of a guy is around 75 y/o so the kid may not even be out of highschool before he loses that parent. As well - why would a guy that old even want kids? Is he going to change diapers, go to Disneyland and stand in long sweaty line-ups with them for waterslides and rollercoasters and take them to sports practice? Just a bad idea, all around. At that age, if a guy wants to nurture something, he should get a dog.
I love all veggies (I can't think of one offhand that I dislike). I don't eat much meat so veggies make up quite a big portion of my daily food intake. Love fruits too.
The suggestions already given are great - I also do the frozen fruit/veggies to throw into smoothies and make plenty of salad ahead of time to use for a few days worth so I don't have to individually cut everything up separate.
I have a juicer but I sometimes to go to this one organic juicebar at lunchtime that serves all these great juiced veggie drinks that they make for you while you wait - sometimes it saves the hassle of cutting things up and the clean up.
You can also look into trying different recipes One of my faves is a spinach salad with spicy mushrooms on top and sliced strawberries - drizzled over with a fig balsamic vinaigrette. It's amazing. You can also toss spinach and other veggies into an omelet or scrambled into eggs. If you BBQ - make chunky veggie skewers alternated with your fave meat or seafood. If all else fails - try indian or thai restaurants - they tend to use a lot of veggies in their dishes and the spices/sauces might make them more palatable.
I steam a lot of things as well - I find it keeps the flavour and colour and makes veggies much tastier - the broccoli is greener, the asparagus is crisper and it's great to steam things like butternut squash (if you add a bit of butter and brown sugar to this, it tastes just like a dessert!).
Actually I consider a 'muscular' vs 'athletic' body (because he cited them as separate choices) to mainly mean bodybuilder/bulked up guy vs lean muscle but toned/fit/athletic guy. They both have muscle mass but when I think of an athletic body type, I don't think of a roided up beefy muscular guy. I think of lean muscle mass - like a swimmer's body - healthy but natural. Pretty much those side-by-side pics that SP posted sum up the differences best if we're just looking at the options on the poll and they way they're differentiated.
To a degree, genetics obviously play a role - everyone's body has natural tendencies and predispositions. But anyone can be healthy/fit with the right discipline and commitment - that's what I meant about being able to 'control it to some degree'. Someone who is predisposed to being heavy can turn the tides with diet/exercise/discipline but it takes more effort. Obviously not everyone can be an athlete (professionally) or look like a sculpted Greek God, but everyone can attain some degree of health and fitness. I think that's what's attractive to most women when they say they want a fit guy. It's attainable (unless someone has a medical condition etc.). And you can still be quite lean (or even thick) but still be reasonably fit.
I also don't think that having an athletic body and a good-looking face necessarily always go hand in hand - so I can see why the OP would differentiate them. It's like the whole 'butterface' theory when guys talk about women sometimes. It can also apply to guys.
He probably just meant traits for instant physical attraction.
Anyway - I went with athletic body, but face is important too. I'm not into a heavily muscled (ie. roid-enhanced) physique. Strong, healthy, fit with some muscle definition is best. It's one of the few things a person can control to a certain degree - tallness and good looks are typically more based on the genetic lottery.
That also doesn't mean a guy has to look like an Olympic athlete - obviously there will be non physical factors that have a much greater influence on overall attraction, so it's not all just based on a physical ideal but I think health and general fitness is important.
