Quote by Seeker4
I, personally, wouldn't use one. I write for the love of being creative so using a bot kind of misses the point for me.
If they are going to be allowed, then I suggest there be a requirement that bot-generated stories be clearly marked, whether by giving them their own category or a mandatory tag like "bot". And I probably would not allow them in comps unless the comp was themed to incorporate them.
Given those conditions, I would be fine with them being here but I certainly think people claiming authorship on something they generated using a bot is iffy territory.
That said, doesn't OpenAI forbid the use of their bots, both GPT and Dall-E for prurient purposes? Not sure about others. That would limit their utility here in any case so it might be more of an issue for SS where I have already made similar comments.
I have used an image bot to generate a cover image but only once (it is on my latest story on SS).
Footnote: Just saw Susie's post. Her use of "ChatGPT" as a tag is exactly what I have in mind.
For me, the experiments I carried out lacked soul. Very dull with no insight or sense of essence, for want of a better word. And yes, it is quite prudish... if you ask it to write something involving cheating or voyeurism for example, it says it can't.
It also takes a lot of time. You have to ask it to redraft and redraft. So I can't see the point of it here. I was looking at it from an educational assessment point of view where it will write an essay in seconds. The future of assessment will be an interesting journey as it doesn't get picked up by plagiarism software as it is a unique piece of writing.
