It's admirable that some actors would go to such lengths to be more believable in a role. But you still have to have some ability. Lindsay Lohan can get big and fat or rail skinny, she still doesn't have the same acting ability as Meryl Streep. (or Bugs Bunny for that matter). No matter how fat or fit Steven Segal is, he's still a shitty actor. Whether or not an actor has made some sort of miraculous physical transformation should have no bearing on their nomination for an Oscar.
In the original examples listed by DD, i was particularly impressed with the acting of Charlize Theron in "Monster" and Ellen Burstyn in "Requiem For A Dream". Their transformations added to the credibility of the character, but their skill as actors made their appearances believable.
I saw the aftermath of an entire section of concrete Highway overpass fall onto the Interstate below it. Got there less than a minute or so after it happened. From the earthen ramp on one end to the middle concrete pillars in the middle, both concrete lanes of the upper section were hit by a crane on a flat bed truck. Crushed a couple cars when it it, killing all instantly. Another couple cars didn't have anywhere near enough time to stop and slammed head first into the the concrete wall that suddenly appeared. Others ran into the backs of those. So much blood everywhere. It was awful.
I know it's Ask the Gals, but yes I've done shower sex. And I highly recommend it!
I understand what CD is saying. As well as what DD is saying.
For some, the term slut is a bad word. They see "slut" as someone who uses sex like a drug. They don't really like sex but don't really have anything else to do. They may not even be attracted to the guy they're fucking, but just seeking out that temporary acceptance and good feeling. As soon as the fucking is done, her own demons come right back and she looks for another cock to fill her.
For the record, there are just as many guys that fill that definition as there are women.
I don't care if a woman sleeps with one guy or one million. The number or partners or the "kinks" she enjoys don't necessarily make her a "slut".
Much ado about nothing. Who cares. The use of the terms "MILF" and "Cougar" is number 4,345,789 on the list of things that need to be changed. If that's your biggest worry in life, then you've got a great life.
Lush is a fantasy site. People that read/write MILF stories are fantasizing about what turns them on. Who are we to take away their fantasy or tell them how to label it. Whoever said that MILFs are "desperate", "sex-craved", "nymphos" or "wanton"? Maybe they are maybe they aren't, but so is everyone else.
Also, no one said that a woman has to be a prude after giving birth. Young guys like fucking older women, it's just reality. The term MILF has no designation that moms are unable to get laid. I think you're over thinking it.
In years past, men on the prowl were often referred to as "Wolves".
If you don't like the MILF sex category, don't read it. Some people don't like the Reluctance category, should we do away with it too? There is no DILF category because it's not wanted or needed.
