Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
overmykneenow
4 hours ago
Straight Male
0 miles · England

Forum

It can't have got past your attention that there are an awful lot of cow-pokes roaming the prairies at the moment.

Get your war-paint on and grab your tomahawks, before they shoot all the buffalo.
Look on the upside at least you found out what an uptight asshole she was BEFORE you added her as a friend (you didn't add her did you?)
This may be completely unrelated but you mention that you suffered from a life-threatening illness/accident.

Illness can have a huge psychological effect on sexual intimacy. Cancer, for example, can leave people revolted by the idea of sex - and this all happens at a subconscious level. If there have been any changes to your sex life from before and after your illness it might be worth exploring therapy as way of rebuilding the levels of intimacy you expect from a healthy relationship.

I see from your other posts you were circumcised late in life - now i'm only guessing but this would suggest to me that either:

a) you suffered from phimosis so found penetrative sex painful, hence your preference for oral sex, or

b) you had to on the grounds of your partner's religion or upbringing - which might suggest a more repressed attitude to sex hence her thoughts of oral as "dirty"

If it's a) you might need some help to get more pleasure from penetrative sex (stopping wanking might help too), if it's b) then you need to talk things over with her about the role sex has in your relationship but approach it from a position of what you both need from sexual intimacy rather than simply what you want
Rush is a great actor and looks a lot like Fleming but a biopic about Fleming's life would probably be better served looking at his younger life and what influenced him

This is why Dominic Cooper has been chosen in the new series Fleming being shown on Sky in the UK "soon". I really want this series to be good.



http://www.sky.com/tv/show/fleming
I've changed from first to third between drafts before. First is fine if the only head you need to be in is the one telling the story

Looking at my own work, gender appears to be the deciding factor. Where a female character is the focus of the story (Daguerreotype, Three bears, Brazilian Wanderer) the stories are told in 3rd person. Where a male is the focus (Student Body, Unreserved Seating, Totally Unacceptable, Scotch Bonnet) I use first person.

Luckily you have a gender-neutral name and av - this helps with first person as some readers are easily confused. For me, a female voice from a clearly male author (and vice versa) can impede the flow or lead to extra exposition in the opening. Yes, I know lots of people here manage it but I must be in the easily confused portion of the community.

There is a draft of Unreserved Seating where at the end it's revealed that the narrator is female but I dropped it before publishing. It can still be read with a male or female voice but I would think 99.99% of people read it as male.
My story, Circle of Friends uses a lot of scene transitions as it tells seven mini stories about seven characters. Like Abigail, I used story breaks (****) to signal the start of each new mini story.

I've seen other authors use italics to signal a separate sub-plot. I personally don't like this - I prefer to see story telling with words rather than typography. The practice encourages lazy writing.
the rusty sheriff's badge
the chocolate tea towel holder
Bourneville boulevard, Cadbury alley (US: Hershey highway)
marmite motorway
log flume
brass eye
brown eye
mudeye
muckspreader
the tradesman's
the munt
Men of a certain age will have some kind of appeal to younger women but it's not usually because she wants a replacement dad.

Girls grow up attracted to boys older than themselves, it comes with reaching maturity earlier. Things we associate with this stage of our sexual development often carry through to later life, in one form or another - instead it goes from 21 year olds with their own cars to 40 year olds with their own house. Women who are attracted to older men will usually tell you that older men are more confident and are more comfortable with themselves. That's not necessarily true but older men do tend to have higher status and are usually better off - attractive qualities to a lot of women

Your friend should be careful though - a girl half his age may treat him a little too much like her actual dad: expect him to pay for anything she wants, not be entirely honest as to who she hangs out with or maybe just patronise him.
I have no idea but there are people who earn a good deal of money from people after the type of relationship you're looking for.

Apologies in advance if this seems out of turn but have you considered paying for sex? It would give you exactly what you want and you'd have no complaints about being duped or misled.
Allowing HTML tags in forms can leave a website open to script injections. Line breaks using the carriage return on its own should be enough for what you want.
Any chance we can have a block gif option?

There's a user here with a 3.9MB gif avatar - yes, that's right - an avatar!
All you need do is call ████████ a ████████, a ████ or a ██████

Either that or point out how you can ████████████ █████ ██████ this site to ████ ██████ ████████████ - that should get your post deleted in no time.

Though of course you'll probably get a lifetime ban too
Quote by little_kitty
I'm actually fond so far of the way that Wix is setup, and I've found that altering the design of my page is fairly easy. Of course, I'm also pretty computer-savvy and can figure my way around without many problems.


Altering a design in wix is simple enough, changing template is actually impossible. Their advice: create a new website...

http://www.wix.com/support/forum/html5/getting-online/wishlist/change-between-templates-inside-an-account-a-2
Feel free to tell me to shut up but I've noticed that at least one of the stories in the comp has been given a RR already.

I'm certainly NOT suggesting the story doesn't deserve a thumbs up, I just think that for the sake of fairness as a competition it would be better to hold back on handing out accolades until after the closing date.
Scoring is one of the most sensitive issues on this place and, for me, the longer I've been here the more meaningless it's become.

Most authors here will tell you that they love scores but what they really value are comments - good or bad. If you think something was lacking - tell them. You're entitled to an opinion and you shouldn't feel constricted in giving it.

You don't have to be a good writer to recognise when something doesn't work. Yes I value the comments made by experienced Lush authors, but I also value the opinions of those who i've never crossed paths with but who have taken the time out to read whatever i've produced.

Of course you have to differentiate between something that's bad and something that's just not your cup of tea. Different people like different things - if it's not your kink, just move on to the next story and leave that one for those that do like that sort of thing.

Hope that helps
Since wix moved from being entirely flash-based to HTML5 there have been improvements to its service. As it is, I still wouldn't recommend it - especially for a writer's website.

As a writer you'd be better served utilising a blog tool such as blogger.com or wordpress.com - these may not be as visually exciting as some wix designs but they are a hell of a lot easier if you decide that you'd like to change the template at some stage. The host advertising on these sites is also a lot less intrusive. Alternatively, you could get just as much by concentrating your efforts on a facebook page.

If you're looking for an free online shop, it might be worth checking jimdo.com

Get your own URL too but don't get it from Network Solutions or GoDaddy. Use 1&1 or 123reg instead.
Quote by lafayettemister



I don't think they did it to themselves, no. I don't think a person who becomes a victim intended it to happen nor are they responsible for someone else's actions.


But as far as you're concerned they don't deserve any assistance from the law.
Quote by lafayettemister



Then they can sue in civil court for damages. And that doesn't protect something created by the "offender". If my gf and I go to a nude beach, I take pics of her naked body, on a public beach and then post it online; have I broken this supposed law? Do I not have the same copyright protection you mention?

Post a pic of an ex online is more of a revenge motivated attack than a sexually motivated one, to me. The tool of the attack may be sexual in nature but doesn't necessarily qualify as sexually motivated. I understand your point and I respect your opinion, I just disagree this time.


The scenario you're mentioning is exactly why they're using the laws of indecency. Nudist beaches are special designated areas by law and no different to being naked in your own home. Allowing images taken in these places to be available for public viewing would breach this designation as you're taking the image outside of the area. There are also issues of image rights but those laws are a bit of a mess.
Quote by lafayettemister


A DVD is protected under copyright law, dick pics aren't. If guy takes a pic of his topless girlfriend, that's his pic, his property.

I also don't think a person convicted of this should have to register as a sex offender. Imagine some 17-18 year old kid, getting his heart broken, angrily posts topless pics of his ex online. A lifetime of not being able to get a job, labelled in the same category as violent rapers.. too harsh a penalty.


Copyright laws protect everyone. If you created something - even if it's just a picture of your meat and two veg - you have copyright of that image and you're able to enforce that image's usage (according to copyright law). You don't have to put the little (c) sign on it, you don't have to include terms and conditions. If you created it - you own it.

The person is carrying out a sexually motivated attack on someone - that sounds like a sexual offence to me.
Quote by lafayettemister

If Person A takes pics of his junk and gives it to Person B, then it becomes property of Person B and Person B can do with it whatever he wants.


No it doesn't and no he can't unless given express permission by the content creator. Much like buying a DVD doesn't give me the right to share it online.
Quote by Dancing_Doll
It's a great idea in concept but it will be a major drain on the courts and legal system and public defenders because it's just so prolific a practice... all those myex.com sites and blunders... it's endless. Jails are already jammed in many places, I really don't know if they have the resources to start tossing in the evil exes. Don't a lot of people and celebs get jail-time massively reduced because the jails are at max capacity? I'm sure I remember Lohan and Paris serving only a day to a week and then being released because there was no jail-space for small-time offenders. A lot of cases will be difficult to prove as well because there are so many variables that come into play. I think they should go after those that post pics of minors etc and then consider hefty fines for other cases or small-claims court if the victim wants to go after the person that posted the pics. I'm not sure jail-time is feasible given the demands on the justice system in a lot of areas.


Often in cases like these jail time is unnecessary - the conviction alone should be enough to damage reputation and discourage the offence. I don't know how they're making this law stick in California but the process in the UK is being set up to go through the indecency laws - making it criminal rather than the civil proceedings people have been limited to so far.

Any conviction will give a criminal record to the perpetrator as well add his (I don't think i'm being too sexist here) name to the sexual offenders register. Both of which will come up if he ever goes for a job that requires a CRB check.
Well let's put it this way: would you open up a joint bank account with your internet lover?
I wanted to go back and redo the research I did last time but it looks like the four-bomber was back in operation last week - stories getting 50-odd votes and only three comments - so the data will be pretty much useless.

There's no evidence at the moment to suggest that female avatars alone get better comments or votes but it would seem that they do get more attention