Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
overmykneenow
5 hours ago
Straight Male
0 miles · England

Forum

45 minute doc of how lust controls our subconscious decision making. Basically how men think with their dicks.

Oh yeah, and keep your eye out for helpful women

Well I found it interesting

Quote by Tenon
Thanks for all the responses. Authors seem unanimous in their reaction to my request. I understand.


It's an unsurprising reaction from authors here but all you're really doing is no different to a DJ re-mixing other people's songs. Sadly a lot of authors here have seen their work ripped off and are understandably wary of anything that would make that job easier.

Even up to a couple of years ago there was an "Embellish" feature on Lush to do exactly the kind of thing you would want to: readers could add and change aspects of stories but I think this has been deactivated now.

Of course, there are work-arounds to reactivate Ctrl+C and other export options but I'm not going to be the one to tell you how to do it.
Have you heard of the term "carney marriage"? That's what it reminds me of. A vague intention of staying kind of monogamous, for a while.

Out of interest how many of those six weddings are still in blissful online union? Most of the ones I end up hearing about turn quickly into car crashes.
Quote by kornslayer1
Especially when a guy uses a woman's pic, what's the point of that?


As I've on mentioned on another thread recently, having a picture of a woman can get you up to twice as many votes on a story regardless of the actual sex of the author. It just works.

It also gets you more profile views: 9 of the 20 most visited male profiles have a picture of a woman as the av.
The problem you have is that you perceive the reader has more knowledge/experience than you do. As far I know, Agatha Christie never actually murdered anyone but then neither had 99.99% of her readership.

That really shouldn't put you off though. I can't imagine you've found your way to this corner of the internet without a reasonable, basic understanding of the mechanics of sex. As a grounding, that's pretty much all you need to know - the rest, like any writing, is about identifiable characters and intriguing situations.

One other thing: like porn, most of what you read here has little to do with actual sex.
Having an av of a beautiful woman does appear to help in getting more reaction to your stories as this quick and dirty research I did in January suggested...

http://www.lushstories.com/forum/yaf_postsm1057961_Misleading-Avatars.aspx#1057961

Quote by overmykneenow
There is a definite advantage if you're an author and have av of a sexy woman.

Go to buy a magazine; the ones aimed at men have beautiful women on the covers, the ones aimed at women have beautiful women on the covers. There's a reason for this.

NUMBERS GEEK-ERY ALERT

Ok, I did a tiny bit of analysis to see if I could back this up. I took a random sample of three pages of story links from about a week ago, I didn't count the stories because they attract an abnormally high amount of votes compared to other catergories.
[code]

Total sample: 40 stories

Avatar No of stories No of votes Average votes per story
Default red male 5 33 6.6
Default red female 3 23 7.7
Miscellaneous 17 185 10.8
Male 10 114 11.4
Female 15 241 16.1
[/code]

A very small sample but certainly enough to lend weight to what most people would assume to be true


Of course this doesn't suggest that the votes would be better, only closer analysis would show that
Quote by Mazza


So, we need characters like Brand (I'm not saying I'd want someone like him as Prime Minister or anything like that, but were there more like him, controversial, shaking things up, more people would be interested and likely to vote).

George Galloway was a favourite of mine (I've met him a few times, when he used to come into the office of the newspaper where I worked - he was sleazy, charming and completely engaging). He was always interesting to watch and listen to in interviews.

Tommy Sheridan was another - as a young man, starting out, he was so eloquent and had such fire and determination and you know what? He actually roused us Scots, got us off our arses and onto our feet to get rid of the Poll Tax - and we did! I can't remember the last time I've seen such unity (we need someone like him now)

The politicians, always so good at spin and backstabbing, wriggling and all that malarkey, need to accept the way that people communicate nowadays - move with the times and embrace social media, use it better to their advantage, rather than belittling those who are lethargic, lazy and do not vote (for whatever reasons) - after all, they've nurtured this mindset, haven't they? Only they can turn it around now (if they even want to)

Really, what I am saying is that we need more people who can put that fire back in our bellies, get us up and voting, interested and involved - characters like Brand are just what we need.


It's easy to be a personality - you just have to not be an arsehole. In fact you don't even have to do that. Brand can get by with delighting less than 10% of the population and he'd still have enough fame to sell his films, DVDs and *ahem* "bookie-wooks". The worse thing he can do is prank call octogenarians.

Trouble is when you're a politician you have to please so many people you end up pleasing no one. Eventually you're going to have to close a hospital, knock down a donkey sanctuary, invade somewhere or something equally uncool.

This is why talk of Eddie Izzard becoming London Mayor is just baffling - he won't be able to "Azerbaijan" his way though budget meetings or transport infrastructure tendering bids.

Paxman went easy on him because he knows Brand is just hot air. He's not changing anything, he's not doing anything except saying "look at me".

I did like Rob Webb's response to him in the New Statesman
Quote by Mazza
You know, I think that Brand eloquently expresses the feeling of many with regard to politics - not just in the UK, but further afield.

Now, I don't know if you are aware or not, but Scotland are currently in the process of devolving from the rest of UK, but we are such a lazy, lethargic nation that it seems unlikely that anyone will even care, especially the younger generation.

Why?

Because they know little or nothing of politics. There are very few interesting politicians. At least with someone like Brand, he has a different take on things, different motivations and to my mind would be a breath of fresh air - something that is very much needed at this time...


Unfortunately there's no difference between not-voting through apathy and not-voting at a protest - it just makes the vote of those you don't agree with even stronger.

Brand strikes me as someone who has self-parodied so much he doesn't even what he is any more. His agenda appears to be that of the Green Party, and I'm sure he's affluent enough to live in an area of London that has a Green candidate - so why not vote Green, they need as many votes as they can get. Paxman's right - how can you have a view on politics and democracy if you're actively promoting self-disenfranchisement?

I live in one of the safest Tory seats in the country, I still vote despite the fact that my vote is effectively worthless. Why should I bother? I bother so that my vote can diminish the vote of any BNP or UKIP candidates. In the last election, 2% of those who bothered voting in the UK, voted BNP - one person in fifty - a shamefully high proportion.

Yes, young people need to feel involved in politics and made to feel that they can have a say. Unfortunately most young people's idea of voting is something they have to ask the bill payer's permission for first. I can't see how one of the the poster boys for everything that's wrong with celebrity culture in the UK is going to change that.
I wonder how many cheaters have been caught out on foursquare

"x is now the mayor of the birmingham metropole hotel"
If you're really that way inclined you could make up your own lightweight stat feed using ! Pipes without too much fuss.

I'd convert your stories list into a JSON feed. From there it'd just require a bit of JavaScript monkeying with RegExp - all the stat data is handily placed in key/value pairs separated by |


Form an orderly queue, ladies.
Quote by horny4cock
Sometime back I read an article where a high school football player was suspended for making a touchdown in football then pointing to heaven. I know that we should separate releigon and politics but isn't this going too far? I thought it meant not to teach students about a supreme being but not that if you believe, you will be punished. I'm not sure I believe in a God but should I be punished if I do? Damn! it is school.


I can't find anything refering to a player being suspended from school, but a player was penalised in a game for what was seen as an excessive celebration...



Of course this could be the same incident just escalated by word of mouth.
Quote by gav
The next release will use a different mechanism to retrieve your friends activity to improve performance. These activity streams are being built now, but there is not much historical data with them.

Therefore when I push this version live you will be missing a chunk of friends activity.

Thanks
gav




Not sure if this has anything to do with your current tinkering but the archived friends activity seems to be behaving strangely.

Going to lushstories.com/username/activity shows the recent activity as usual, but when I click "Load More Activity" it adds activity from other friends of mine.
Quote by curious3045


Not sure who Gav is but if he is in charge of keeping the site running he is doing a good job and this is not about him. It is about the resources, yes it is free but obviously there is money coming from some limited advertising and other sources, I am just trying to say that a priority should be upgrading the equipment. My place of work uses all of the same rational that you and slipperywhenwet have used and it is not the correct mindset to have. I look at it like building a house, the foundation has to be strong and done correctly if you expect to have a good house? Correct? The same principles apply with the site and its hardware, regardless of money or the people involved, the priority should be to upgrade the hardware first and then build from there.

So, sorry for being a bit rude slipperywhenwet and overmykneenow, wasn't supposed to come off like that at all. Gav keep up the good work. Whoever is out there that makes the decisions please consider my point. From an IT perspective my thoughts are coming from experience and the hope that resources will be used to improve the foundation of lush, then the improvements are much easier to accomplish.


Where you work is a business and I'm sure it has agreed levels of service it has to maintain to keep share holders happy. Despite it's slickness and professionalism, Lush is a website developed by people in their spare time. It's not an Enterprise-level web application (though it's pretty damn close). It's easy to say build solid foundations but when you design a three bedroom house, if the number of people living in the house multiplies by seven in three years, the house isn't going to work properly.

I find it frustrating too but then I haven't found it frustrating enough to stick my hand in my pocket and pay for gold membership to help finance site improvements. I get Lush for free and I tailor my expectations accordingly.
Quote by curious3045


Okay, please let this one go slippery, believe it or not, I do have a very good handle on what it might take to accomplish this. I know you like to add something to many topics, but this one should be left alone, K. Notice that I even said I am not being critical of anyone, all right. It can be done, for less that what most people think.


While you say you're not being critical it's difficult not to interpret what you say as "gav could be doing a lot better". I know that's not what you're intending with your comments but that's how I first read it.

One of the maxims of development I learnt very early was: "Good, Fast, Cheap - you can pick two"* - Lush is good and Lush is free. As for cheaper options - you can't put a site like this on Dreamhost. [* in reality, it's more like "pick one"]

This improvements thread is as much about streamlining the processes of Lush as it is about loading it with more options. Lush can be a victim of its own popularity - in the time I've been here the userbase has increased 700% - on top of that users have shifted from primarily using keyboard/mouse interaction to touchscreen changing the whole way people use the site.

I guess at the end of the day, Lush is like a very popular bar: people love it but you might have to wait to get served.
Quote by gav


It's very hard to drag and droop with your finger, ask me how I know


There's a very minor bug on the new handy dandy customisable friends list. If someone with only a few friends (in this case 11) selects a number fewer than the friends they have (in this case 5) the "More" link to show the full list of friends isn't showing - so it looks like the person only has 5 friends in total

I can send you a link of the affected profile
To echo JohnC, it's a bit of a generalisation to say all men are baffled by this. And yes most questions posted in the ask the gals section seem directed solely as exercises in friends list generation - "do you find penises attractive - yes? good I'll send you 50 pictures of mine".

Other reasons could be that these guys completely lack empathy or, more likely, they're sexually immature and have the idea that a woman's role in sex as purely passive.
A bi curious dull ex from Galush
had interests just kinkily lush
mounting norman's old putter,
quite rightly so to utter,
very wickedly: "xerox your zhush"