
Quote by VirgoGo
You didn't embarass someone, you casually linked/outed Mike and his account. He has his reasons for wanting to make sure that Lush's content management system is working properly, and not like its usual, glitchy self. This indifference to privacy should trouble us all. Moreover, it appears that Mike has since blown up his validation account. I'm on the verge of doing so myself.
I'm apalled by this reintroduced category, and surprised that more people don't recognize the risks it presents. It's embarassing to be caught on a smut site, it's cause for dismissal, at many employers, to be found on THIS kind of smut site. Just flipping a virtual switch and ignoring such foul content does not mean a Lush member is not tainted by it. The reputational cost is potentially devastating (Google "New York cop cannibal" and ponder the custody fight of someone found writing/reading i-porn on Lush, and the concomitant publicity fallout to this site). I can write the article if someone is caught here, so I'm going to make sure that doesn't happen to me. The risk isn't tomorrow, the risk is a year or two from now, when the membership has slipped into complacency, when, say, an Ashley Madison like hack occurs. The other risk is an erosion of standards/principles. Whether at a corporate level (the reintroduction of the category) or at the personal level ("I'll never look at the stuff, oh wait, so and so, whose work I really like, wrote a personal piece...I'll read it just this once...")
So...don't diss Mike. I'm looking at you, too, Seeker. He's exercising appropriate caution. I'll be gone shortly, too. Just tidying up some loose ends, first, and playing the role of Cassandra.
Quote by Simplicity
I find it very disappointing that people as in you seeker4 and sprite( and sprite being in the position you are in on Lush, I’m surprised that you felt you needed to embarrass him the way you did) would jump so quickly to talk about someone that has been our friend and has done very well for himself and as done a lot for Lush. There is a lot of emotions in this category that has been brought back to Lush. A lot of people as in myself are having a hard time with it and have very mixed emotions on wheather or not to stay. Mike felt he had to delete, and I stand beside his decision. I would expect better then trash talk about him. Your only seeing the beginning of what this category is gonna do to some of our people.
Quote by seeker4
Question: Since Category Blocking is being suggested as a solution for those who don't want to see the category in question, does that stop stories from that category from appearing on the front page and other such places for you or just hides it from the categories list? Because if just hides the category, not the stories, it's kind of pointless to suggest it as a solution. To solve the problem, it needs to completely hide all evidence of "the category". I have blocked the category already just to see what happens.
Personally, I'm cool with it existing in this form as long as it is easily avoidable. My first published story was actually in that category (but was subsequently rewritten to remove the relationship that put it in that category).
Quote by Milik_the_Red
Well, I really hate to see Mike go. Deleting is such a finality and he had been so very successful here. I know we are all gonna miss him.
Quote by Milik_the_Red
I have a couple of suggestions.
The first, put in the vault. A genre that rabidly popular and written with Lush’s usual quality would surly help sell memberships. (Other unsavory genres could be placed there too, but enough of that)
Second. PLEASE don’t allow stories to take up space but the top ten stories of the last month. I don’t think many of us want to see How I Screwed My Daddy as the top five stories all the time.
Right. Peace out.
Quote by Magical_felix
How are they supposed to do that? Create a poll in the forum that will get 20 votes by the same dopes that post in the forum everyday? Send a Massive PM to the whole membership and then read every reply? lol
Quote by Verbal
That line kinda pissed me off too, but discussion of the subject is being entertained, right here (as well in BBs and emails and blog posts all day). I am made uncomfortable by the change, too. And I am not particularly moved by the "we've gotta make money" argument. But this is a community, and one that caters to sexual fantasies, sometimes disturbing ones, and there was an equal outcry against censorship by this same community when the category was first removed.
It was a noble attempt, it didn't work out.
Quote by Milik_the_Red
It still all comes down to choice, and remember, I am actually in support of the change. I understand your points of supporting woman’s issues. I was here, working behind the scenes with you for years in the fight. Also, I was the one who first purposed the LGBTQ forum, something I was grilled unmercifully for right here on Lush. I consider this to be my greatest contribution to the site. So yes, I totally understand that Lush is more than a simple erotic literature site.
As a mod, I put aside my inherent libertarian bent. I was part of a group that had to look out for the site and put it above my own views and I did. Okay, now I’m just a member and I won’t sell my views short anymore. So I say now, even though I agree in adding the new genre, that trying to say we are protecting women’s issue while allowing is farcical. Most victims of are female after all, we are fooling ourselves if we try to find any moral high ground. We are dancing with the devil here and choosing only one song to dance to is no less a sin.
Quote by Simplicity
Seems I asked this to be done some time ago. So does this mean ALL categories that are blocked we will not get notified or just ?
Quote by Varrick
You’re obviously ignoring the part where I said they may never be here again. In the meantime, you’ve managed to piss off some of your current members to the point that they are leaving. I’m not sure how that fosters a sense of community or drives traffic to the site.
Not sure how we’ve been treated with disdain? I guess I’ll just repeat the part where I said that current members weren’t consulted to see if those of us already here wanted the reintroduction of such a divisive category. It just happened. And here are Nicola’s words from the announcement thread:
“No discussions about this decision will be entertained. Please do not create forum posts or contact any moderators or I about it.”
Until this thread blew up, that post made it very clear to us plebs that there was no want to answer any questions on the subject.
I think disdain sums all that up rather well.
Quote by Milik_the_Red
Nor am I. I do find the idea of it somehow being more morally acceptable to dip your toe in one cesspool rather than another to be laughably self-deluding. But that is the conundrum of any aspect of censorship, isn’t it?