Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
sprite
11 hours ago
Moderator
Fluid Female
United States

Forum

Quote by Coco
Ladies (plural)



lol - i came so close to correcting that too!
Quote by HeraTeleia


Note: The no posting while drinking/under the influence rule as described by Dudealicious is a good one, too. Nothing good ever comes of posting while under the influence.


you know that means i would never be able to post again, right?
Quote by Magical_felix


Like that one time you said you were spreading my labia minora.


that's near the dog star, right?

btw, if you're jewish, it's the labia menorah. biggrin
guideline #11: when never cyber with two different partners at the same time. they'll start getting suspicious when you send the wrong person the wrong msg.
My first thought is - do you know WHY she wants to have sex with you? i think that's kind of an important question. you need to answer that first before you go any further with this. also, reality check. you're a virgin? no matter what, you're not going to be able to give her the best night of her life no matter how much you want to. just be cool with that.
Quote by stephanie


That is an UNIMAGINABLY horrible and cruel thing to say.

Really.

xx SF



You've never seen The Karate Kid, have you? Wax on, wax off.
For the record, while we own a strap on, it doesn't get used all that often. variety is the spice of life.
Quote by RavenStar


God, I was going to say the same thing!

Him or Sprite.


Stop that. You'll start rumors...
everyonce in a while i am serious, here...

so, for those of you who think that porn is an accurate portrayal of lesbians, it's not. it's all based on male fantasies of what lesbians look and act like. the truth is, like straight couples and gay couples, lesbians tend to have different tastes, different turn ons and offs, and different desires at different times. here's the thing. sometimes penetration feels real good - trust me, when my partner has on a strap on, i am not fantasizing about her being a man. she's using a toy, a tool, to please me. that's it. there is really nothing masculine about a strap on other then the shape of it - it's all about her, about who is wearing it. simple as that.
Quote by Milik_the_Red
For clairity, how far back in time does a story have to go to be considered history? Would a story based in world war two be eligible? How about the sixties? Just wondering cause you know its going to come up.


yes, and yes (imo).
I'm holding out for the one where Rhonda agrees to Domme me. i mean, seriously, only Rhonda can play Rhonda!
Quote by Ghostreader


I so agree. What I truly don't understand is if lesbians don't like the males "Dick" then turn around and use a strap-on. Doesn't make much sense to me.

Your just using a fake one in place of a real one. Plus I understand the reason about guys having a finger up his ass etc. etc.


as a lesbian, let me explain this in simple terms. Dicks are nice. The rest of the man bites camel nuts. How's that for you. biggrin
Dino Sex is, technically, historical, right? just checking before i start "Dino Orgy - 12 Million BC".
Quote by Magical_felix


I just made up another one too.

sprite-shite: When Rachel posts something ridiculous. Or anything really.

Tom: Did you see that ridiculous post rachel made about Jack?

Fredrick: Yeah, I seen that sprite-shite.


you're such a jacktard.
Quote by Poppet


She doesn't have the badge.

She was being ever so sweet in reminding me of something I said in one forum and pointing out the fact that I'm saying something different here. She's a kind person to do that. Such a wonderful lady.


i... you know what? i'm just going to enjoy this post and leave it at that. biggrin
Quote by Milik_the_Red


Guess I should not have started the Scottish pirate story


kind of late now, Mr Red.
Quote by Magical_felix





I was making up a new word. Ever hear of Shakespeare? He made up new words too. Not so clever now are you?


i just made up a new word too. Jacktard. Just call me Rachel Shakespeare.
Quote by Poppet


Rain on your parade? I thought you were into that sort of thing...


you're thinking of showers, not rain, honey. ;)
Quote by kiera


He also hates OK


he REALLY hates scottish pirates. may i suggest that anyone who reads this posts pictures of scottish pirates on his wall?
Quote by Poppet
Oh, trust me. I plan to write in them all. I simply want to know if we lose a badge we've already gained. It's a simple question. No one needs to be snarky. smile


well, fuck. i had a perfectly lovely snark to post, and you go and rain on my parade. just for that, no eminem badge for you! what? Omnium? oh. never mind.
Quote by Magical_felix


Wether you lose your badge or not. Either way, you should write a historical story. Then no one can say shit about wether it's a true omnium badge or not.


whether, not wether. just okay my ass.
"OK" is the all-purpose American expression that became an all-purpose English expression that became an all-purpose expression in dozens of other languages. It can be an enthusiastic cheer (A parking spot! OK!), an unenthusiastic "meh" (How was the movie? It was…OK.), a way to draw attention to a topic shift (OK. Here's the next thing we need to do), or a number of other really useful things. It's amazing that we ever got along without it at all. But we did. Until 1839.

There may be more stories about the origin of "OK" than there are uses for it: it comes from the Haitian port "Aux Cayes," from Louisiana French au quai, from a Puerto Rican rum labeled "Aux Quais," from German alles korrekt or Ober-Kommando, from Chocktaw okeh, from Scots och aye, from Wolof waw kay, from Greek olla kalla, from Latin omnes korrecta. Other stories attribute it to bakers stamping their initials on biscuits, or shipbuilders marking wood for "outer keel," or Civil War soldiers carrying signs for "zero killed."

The truth about OK, as Allan Metcalf, the author of OK: The Improbable Story of America's Greatest Word, puts it, is that it was "born as a lame joke perpetrated by a newspaper editor in 1839." This is not just Metcalf's opinion or a half remembered story he once heard, as most OK stories are. His book is based in the thorough scholarship of Allen Walker Read, a Columbia professor who for years scoured historical sources for evidence about OK, and published his findings in a series of journal articles in 1963 to 1964.

IT STARTED WITH A JOKE

OK, here's the story. On Saturday, March 23, 1839, the editor of the Boston Morning Post published a humorous article about a satirical organization called the "Anti-Bell Ringing Society " in which he wrote:

The "Chairman of the Committee on Charity Lecture Bells," is one of the deputation, and perhaps if he should return to Boston, via Providence, he of the Journal, and his train-band, would have his "contribution box," et ceteras, o.k.—all correct—and cause the corks to fly, like sparks, upward.

It wasn't as strange as it might seem for the author to coin OK as an abbreviation for "all correct." There was a fashion then for playful abbreviations like i.s.b.d (it shall be done), r.t.b.s (remains to be seen), and s.p. (small potatoes). They were the early ancestors of OMG, LOL, and tl;dr. A twist on the trend was to base the abbreviations on alternate spellings or misspellings, so "no go" was k.g. (know go) and "all right" was o.w. (oll write). So it wasn't so surprising for someone come up with o.k. for oll korrect. What is surprising is that it ended up sticking around for so long while the other abbreviations faded away.

THEN IT GOT LUCKY

OK got lucky by hitting the contentious presidential election jackpot. During the 1840 election the "oll korrect" OK merged with Martin van Buren's nickname, Old Kinderhook, when some van Buren supporters formed the O.K. Club. After the club got into a few tussles with Harrison supporters, OK got mixed up with slandering and sloganeering. It meant out of kash, out of karacter, orful katastrophe, orfully confused, all kwarrelling or any other apt phrase a pundit could come up with. It also got mixed up with the popular pastime of making fun of van Buren's predecessor, Andrew Jackson, for his poor spelling. One paper published a half-serious claim that OK originated with Jackson using it as a mark for "all correct" (ole kurrek) on papers he had inspected.

OK was the "misunderestimated," "refudiated," and "binders full of women" of its day, and it may have ended up with the same transitory fate if not for the fact that at the very same time, the telegraph was coming into use, and OK was there, a handy abbreviation, ready to be of service. By the 1870s it had become the standard way for telegraph operators to acknowledge receiving a transmission, and it was well on its way to becoming the greatest American word.

But, as Metcalf says, its ultimate success may have depended on "the almost universal amnesia about the true origins of OK that took place early in the twentieth century. With the source of OK forgotten, each ethnic group and tribe could claim the honor of having ushered it into being from an expression in their native language." By forgetting where OK came from, we made it belong to us al
Quote by Dani


I laughed harder than any adult ever should at something like this.

I think I actually cackled.


it's the tequila. it makes me spell bad. makes me do other things, too, but i'm just going to leave it at that.
Quote by Magical_felix
I'm almost finished with my first historical story for lush. Hoedown at the Okay Corral.


ROFL! first genuine laugh of the day. thank you, Jack.
Quote by nicola



I hope you find something nice to spend the $100 Prize on.



Can i suggest sexy underwear so...? wait, this is pubic now, isn't it. nevermind! just umm... congratulations and umm... you can collect your other prize later... okay, going to go hide now.
fyi, anyone submitting a story using "okay" instead of "OK" is getting it edited back to "OK" and then forwarded to Clum.