Something involving seafood: maple glazed salmon, spicy butterfly shrimp with lime, sushi rolls, lobster spoons, big fresh oysters on ice with all the tangy toppings...
As dpw said, the girls who do this go through verrry intensive cleaning regimens. I'm not sure about the antibiotics or post-cleaning habits, but it's still a no for me, even after douching. And realistically, it's probably unlikely that every time you have anal, the girl is going to have a proper enema and then a last minute anal douche. If you're preparing for a specific scene with close-ups, sure, but for random anal sex, probably not.
Just for the sake of swapping holes, a vaginal infection - even though it's treatable - isn't something I want to chance. If you're getting paid well to film a scene, risking a weeks course of antibiotics probably isn't as big of a deal. For the average woman, I guess I just don't see the point. The balance inside a healthy vagina isn't something you want to mess with, if you can help it.
I put an early vote down for Marilyn Monroe.
I imagined all the polled women on that list in a room together and which one I would likely spend the night stealing glances at. It was an easy win for Ms. Monroe. To me, it goes beyond looks. Even among the iconic beauties, she was special.
I have been yes - sometimes a light pat down (no sexual overtones), but once in Chicago I had a more in depth one. Basically I was wearing this g-string with a metal/crystal heart that holds the strings together in the back. This beeped and while I explained it to them, they had to do a more thorough pat down. They gave me the option of going to a 'back room' or having it done in this taped off chair thing to the side that was slightly more private but not by much. It was just off to the right of the line of people coming through. I opted for the semi-public search because going to a back room would make me feel like a drug smuggler or something.
They called for a female guard and there was some winking, nodding and elbowing of each other by the other male workers as this female agent came up to me. She was young and attractive and looked a little flustered as she walked over. I felt like it was some big inside joke about girl on girl action among all the agents. It was just the vibe I got. A few of them stared and watched as though we were about to film a softcore porn or something.
The agent was very professional however - she swiped down the front of my jeans and down the back so she could see the metal heart thing. The rest was a thorough pat-down. She went under my shirt just under the wire of my bra, front and back. I didn't feel like it was anything sexual or inappropriate at all by her - more just the bystanders being entertained. I guess they don't get out much.
No, I mostly just make them up in my head. On occasion they're loosely based on myself, a person I know or a friend but that's about it. It can be frustrating later though, if I'm looking for a photo for a book cover or poster. It's not always easy to match up a photo to what you've envisioned in your mind after-the-fact - especially when your photo selection is limited to shutterstock, for example.
If the reader already knows that anal is on the way, you can just use 'hole'.
If she's begging him to "fuck my ass", then for the actual description, you can just proceed to something like "he spread her cheeks apart and slowly eased the length of his shaft into her tight little hole."
Sometimes it feels like a nicer read if you separate the 'ass' and the 'hole' bit. Just going straight for 'asshole' isn't a bad idea though - depending on the style of the story.
As Wilful said - I also use 'knot', or occasionally 'star', but usually with some kind of descriptive reference like "tight little", "pulsing", "tender", "resistant", "slippery", "well-lubed" etc.
You might be referring to it more than once, so it's good to vary it up a bit. As long as it fits with the general tone of the story, it's all good.
Ok, I'm going to sound like I'm making huge generalizations with this one - but I think being hairy is an attractive thing among certain European countries?? Note that I didn't say *all*. But... when I go to an international beach, I often see a lot of hairy euro guys and their women seem totally fine with it. Cut to the typical North American crowd and the guys are all nearly hairless and in longer board shorts on the beach scene or they just have a light smattering on chest/arms/legs. So... it could be cultural too, hence there will always be many women who appreciate that 'manly man' natural look, so your friend shouldn't worry too much.
I have many male friends who have done the shaving/waxing thing. I have on occasion brushed against them when they're shirtless (in a non-sexual way) and was surprised by how prickly some of them are, particularly the ones that are doing *a lot* of shaving to be smooth. It makes me wonder whether it would be somewhat abrasive to get that full-body exfoliation during morning sex. There are obviously negatives to shaving.
If he's self-conscious about it, he could try sugaring/waxing and I believe they have some manscaping techniques now which will weed the hair so there's still some there but so it's not at full sasquatch level. Cutting down on it might make all the difference. There's also laser hair removal or things like that No-No (which I can't vouch for, but it seems popular) on the market.
Personally I prefer smooth-chested to just a light smattering. Back hair bothers me more than chest. That's just my personal preference and what I'm used to, and it's possibly culturally influenced as well. I'm sure there are plenty that love a hairy guy, so he shouldn't stress too much if he wants to stay natural. At the very least, I think having well trimmed pubes is mandatory in this day and age though.
Someone who is great in bed.
Passion, creativity and the ability to express that passion is very important to me. 'Bad in bed' could mean premature ejaculator, impotent, lack of sex drive, inability to let go, conservative sexual morality, sexually selfish and not caring about mutual pleasure.
A sense of humour is important to me, but I don't need a full fledged comedian jokester type who can't get it up or who is done and snoring in under 5 minutes.
I do like them. Placement is not that important - back, over the shoulder, arms, thigh, ribs. It's just about the quality of the design for me.
I dislike toons and new school character stuff on guys though - that has the potential to be a turn-off for me.