Quote by NJStephenXX

A side note: ladies that truly love sucking cock are (i have found) very good at cock sucking. However, only 10% of the ladies I have experienced fit within this category. Yet, 75 % of men, from my experience, are straight away amazing...

Guys know what the other end of the blowjob feels like. Similar deal with pussy eating: women often report that a lot of women are really good at it than men are.

Based on my one experience sucking cock, I'd have to agree with a lot of the other guys that I'd rather give than receive. That said, giving and receiving is even better. 69 is my favorite thing to do with a woman. I suspect mutual blowjobs with a hard man might even be better.

Not a gal, but based on my experience eating women out, if she can talk on the phone normally, I'm not doing a very good job at it. If I am doing a good job at it (and not saying I always do), she is definitely not going to be able to have a normal conversation on the phone.

Love it. Someday I'd like to wake another guy up that way too.

Love it! Fucking or eating it. Only ever done it with my own cum, but I'd still do it with another guy's cum in there.

Quote by Magical_felix

Who will you be voting for?

A) Democrats

B) Republicans

C) A third party protest vote that terrifies the two-party duocracy, and against which they and their extensive network of agents will go to any length to shame, cajole and even threaten to keep us from exercising.

There. Fixed that for you.

Quote by RowanThorn

Oh, it was never about the best candidates. Both were selected by the richest Americans and funded to be president.

The election system isn’t designed to give people what they want, it’s to give you the illusion of choice while only giving you the options that benefit the richest and most powerful.

That being said, Trump is an anomaly because he’s the monster that got too big to control. They no longer want him, Haley was pushed as they could. But their full support in the past and pushing false rhetorics have made Trumpism more of a religion than a political candidate.

Ok Biden’s side the media quashed any stories about people running against him. It was a non-primary. There was never a true choice…

Unless y’all realize you don’t have to vote for either. Until you accept that you eat what you’re given.

I agree with absolutely everything in the above post.

Quote by RowanThorn

If the democrats had half the gumption for reproductive rights as they did for sucking the same corporate cocks the republicans did then abortion access would have been codified decades ago.

I do wish the Dems had had the gumption to codify abortion rights into law. That said, there have only been three weeks this entire century when they had the Presidency, the filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and the majority in the House they would have needed to pull it off. Obama used that rare opportunity to express all his political capital into passing his Republican-originated version of health care reform.

It's been interesting to me how many people now identify as "straight" but are actually open to same-sex sex. When I was younger, even the slightest inclination made you bisexual by definition. Apparently the new form of bisexual erasure is to define it really narrowly.

Some of these folks are very open to sex with the same sex, but of course have zero romantic interest in the same sex. But the thing is, bisexual does not mean biromantic. I'm wondering if they're just getting their terms mixed up.

Personally, I officially identify on here as bi-curious rather than bisexual because I have very, very little sexual experience with men. But I have always known I had bisexual desires. Until about the age of fifty, those desires were strictly sexual, often focused on the penis only. More recently, I've thought that if I were single today, I'd at least be open to dating men in addition to fucking them, and some of my more recent stories explore that.

Quote by Hmm45

Maybe you're better suited to a picture book...Are you serious, too long...ohhh shit you've probably already lost interesy reading this...tooo long for you?

That's a lot, when all of us have dozens of stories in our Reading Queues and can't possibly get to them all. Once again, more succinctly: I'll read 10,000-word stories from time to time, but they had better be fucking literature.

Sorry to jump in late, but I think it's important to be aware that women being prosecuted for having miscarriages is not a new thing. It didn't become a new thing when Roe was overturned, either. Prosecutors have been weaponizing state laws to criminalize miscarriages for many years.

It was happening before Casey: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59214544.

... and it has gotten worse since Casey. https://news.yahoo.com/women-being-jailed-losing-pregnancies-153048373.html

... even in "pro-choice" states like California: https://www.npr.org/2022/07/03/1109015302/abortion-prosecuting-pregnancy-loss

Worth mentioning that well-off and/or white women have been much safer from this than women of poverty and/or color.

Just ate my own cum the other day. Wasn’t out of a freshly fucked pussy, but I like that too. Either way, yum!

Quote by M_K_Babalon

Those are lazy folks, or got too much going in their lives.

Then the whole world is lazy. NO ONE ON EARTH has the time to get done everything that they want in life. We all have to pick and choose how we spend our time. To not do this is to lack executive functioning skills.

For I, one author out of thousands on this site, to demand that people read every one of my precious nine thousand words would be the height of self-importance. Not only is it not going to happen, it would be arrogant to insist on it. I'm not that important. Neither are you.

Quote by DanielleX

Poisonous and venomous. Toadstools and Golden Dart Frogs are poisonous; Black Mambas and Box Jellyfish are venomous.

Poisonous things are of themselves toxic. Venomous things deliver the toxin by biting etc.

I wasn't aware of that distinction. I will remember that.

Quote by Quietlywatching

How about hoe and ho. Huge difference!

Quote by DanielleX

Do you judge these to be commonly confused?

I don't think they are commonly confused in the singular, although I have occasionally read a story referring to a woman as a "hoe." Maybe the confusion has to do with the plural for both words being spelled "hoes?"

The answer to the original question is that a human has to review your work. Word by word. And they may have to do that with many other stories at more or less the same time. And they may also have families and jobs and other things to do besides validate our smut. So yeah, sometimes takes a while.

An upgraded membership does help. My stories usually get reviewed within a day or two. And sometimes they don't. Which is okay. When that happens, it's reasonable to assume the mods are pretty busy. I know they'll get to it when they can.

Also, FWIW, "Just saying" is the most passive-aggressive phrase in the English language, especially when combined with "Not complaining." Just saying.

Some of my recent series have had a chapter or two that are there to introduce the characters and ramp up the sexual tension, and don’t have any sex between them (though they might recall past sexual escapades or include anticipatory masturbation). But I usually keep every chapter of a series within the same category (which, in my case, is usually Bisexual).

Not that it’s absolutely necessary to stay within a category. I recently read an enjoyable four part series in which every chapter was in a different category. Maybe that’s a good strategy to pick up more readers. I guess I should eventually dream up a wide-ranging, category-spanning tour de force.

Yes, it helps immensely to have a picture. I just started doing that a few months ago, and even went back and edited some of the better/more popular of my past stories to include pics.

Although one pic is sufficient, I'm starting to do three pics for some of my stories. In addition to the official cover photo, which has to meet certain rules (no penetration, no erection, I think), I've also been creating an alternate, more explicit version that I post to my profile page when I publish the story. And more recently, noticing that some people have been posting "thank you" messages and pics to the profile walls of people who Like or comment on their stories, I've most recently been creating a third image and following that practice myself. I'm still pretty basic in my photo editing skills, but have learned a few things in the process.

Jake Gylenhaal, although his sister is hot too. And FWIW, I am gay or bisexual.

Quote by colin123

Love your stories, have to agree that 9000 words is a bit too long for me.

Thanks for that! I haven't done anything over 5000 words since that entry. Even in the last competition, which had a limit of 10k, I kept it to less than half that, and have had what appears to be success breaking what might be a single long story down into chapters under 2k.

Oh hell yes. I get more excited, and pause more frequently to jerk off, when I'm writing it than when I'm reading it.

I have certainly learned about the wonderful variety of human bodies that are out there, even if some body types and looks are disproportionately dominant on website.

On a less positive note, maybe the biggest thing I've learned is more than I wanted to know about the sex-ignorant tastes of today's thirteen year old boys, because there seems to be an awful lot of porn catering to their tastes (and couldn't possibly hold any appeal to adult men who've actually been with women). Along those lines, I've learned what a disturbing number of people have fantasies about .

Really not interested in licking anyone's armpits, hairy or shaved.

When I was younger, I never found hairy armpits on a woman attractive, but neither was it a turnoff. When I was a young man, I had more than one girlfriend let her armpit and leg hair go during the winter when no one would see her in a swimsuit. Was pretty much the standard routine.

Mind you, this was in the Eighties, when NO ONE shaved their pussies. Trimmed, sure. But shaving it all wasn't a thing.

Then the Nineties hit, and removing beautiful pubes has become the norm for women (and a disappointing number of men). Armpit hair has become a turn-on for me, not in and of itself, but because it's a strong indicator of a hairy pussy. Just to look at, though, not to lick.

Quote by LauraLovesYou

If I understood correctly... this is what the priest HAS to do to give me the catharsis and satisfaction I want. Admitting that he likes it and wants to do it, although being conflicted because of his beliefs. If you think about it, in some "branches" of the church, priests can marry and have a normal sexual life. That's what I want him to "understand" as he ruined my sexual life for a while. Did you mean this?

Yes, I would think that having him admit he wants it - before you make contact - satisfies the consent requirement. And maybe the catharsis requirement too! Once he agrees to his punishment, you can punish him all you want.

Well, the Sears catalog and National Geo were certainly fodder for my young fantasies, but my first experience with real porn was parents' and friends' parents' Playboys. And then Penthouses. So many sessions inspired by the latter, and by the Forum stories as much as the pictorials. My love for dirty stories is why I'm here.

There was also an erotic novel at a neighbor's house once when I was ten or twelve. I think that was the first time I ever read about girl-girl action, and that blew my mind.

No real interest. Also a step closer to having sex outside my marriage, which I'm not ready to do right now.

I load my own Christmas tree, and do a damned better job of it than the people at the tree farm.

6"

I've worked in corporate or government office environments for well over three decades. At none of these places or times was hitting on, letting alone fucking, coworkers considered remotely acceptable. Even dating between coworkers, if not outright prohibited by company policy, has always had to be pretty damned covert. I guess there was a time (Seventies, according to Hollywood) where this stuff went on all the time?

Maybe it still happens in a few industries. I do know a few women in male-dominated fields who regularly get hit on - and for the most part, they fucking hate that aspect of the job. But for the most part, it isn't remotely accepted. Plenty of fish in the sea outside work, especially now that we can find partners on the Interwebs.

Quote by Seeker4

I still don't get why stuff like this is state-level. In Canada it's federal and it is 16 (with a provision that if the couple are both under 16 or within two years of each other, there's an exemption to avoid criminalizing teen sexual exploration).

I am married to someone 9 years older. In terms of younger, I have probably been with women around 10-15 years younger when I was playing around with escorts (they often lie about age so hard to tell for sure), though the first one I was with was around my age.

Because we are a federation of states that mostly make their own criminal laws, except where a convincing case is made that a particular crime is of national or interstate concern. Even murder laws, for the most part, are defined by the states. Lots of variation in what constitutes first versus second or third degree murder, versus manslaughter, etc. from one state to another. Some states don't even have vehicular homicide laws.

Drinking ages used to vary widely too (some states 18, some 19, some 21; some had younger ages for active servicemembers than the general public) until the federal government stepped in and threatened to withhold highway funding from states that didn't make it 21. Even today, we do not technically have a federal drinking age, but rather fifty individual state laws declaring 21 as the age.

FWIW, the state in which I slept with a 17-year-old had a statutory minimum of 16 - unless it involved a power relationship (employer-employee or teacher-student, for example), in which case the age of consent was 18. Seems a good way to do it, but I've also lived in states where the age was 18 for everyone, which seems a bit high to me but everyone accepted it as the norm because that's what it always was.

My thinking (and whichever reviewer gets assigned your story may or may not agree) is that while unconsented physical force is absolutely not going to be allowed here, one way you might be able to frame this is having the priest ultimately consent just an instant before any actual physical sexual contact occurs - finally admitting his secret desires and or transgressions, and acquiescing to your punishment. I suspect that might work. Would that still give you the catharsis you're seeking?