I don't think she was being all that serious with the comment based on what I saw of the interview.
I think the gist of what she was getting at is that she's going to be provocative and push her sexuality in a public way while she's in her prime. A twenty year old doing what she does looks far different than a forty year old putting herself out there in the same way. That's not to say that you *literally* stop having sex or being kinky past a certain age, but I think you tend to tone yourself down more as far as your public face goes. It's similar to that whole phraseology of "isn't she a little too old to be doing that or wearing that?" based on what we perceive age-appropriate priorities to be. I think Miley is just capitalizing on the raunch because she's the right age to be doing it and getting away with it before that whole shift to a 'mature artist' that will probably occur down the line. I think that was what she meant in the interview when he's asking her about why the sex-thing is such a big part of her persona or the way she's expressing herself... and she was just being cheeky about it or looking to push buttons.
I'm glad someone started a thread about her though. I'm constantly amazed at how much backlash this girl gets over her performances or her music videos. I can only assume it's because of her Hannah Montana origins that she's being crucified for everything she does when there have been endless provocative and sexually over-the-top performers before her in decades past. From what I've seen, she's quite deliberate with everything she does and comes off as quite intelligent and in control of the direction of her career.
Yes, among other influences. Sex as well. I think party favours and rec. substances might be a little trickier for guys who still have to be able to get it up and then cum. Some make it a little more difficult. For women, it's easier for us to just enjoy the ride.
Another vote for Lelo Soraya from me. Seriously - if you did a poll, it's probably going to be the runaway winner in this thread. I have many toys but if I could only have one, Soraya is all I'd need.
I've volunteered to be a body-paint canvas for a charity event before. It's really messy - especially the clean-up (your shower will need some hardcore cleaning). As fun as it was, I wouldn't want to do it as a regular thing.
Rob Zombie's version of Halloween (so much better than the original)
Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003 version. I have good memories associated with this movie, so there's a bit of nostalgia - long story)
Hostel (such a classic)
Jeeper's Creepers (a bit cheesy but it's always on TV at this time of year and the acting/characters are solid)
House at the End of the Street (not that scary but Jennifer Lawrence is awesome)
Jennifer's Body (while not scary in a typical way, this movie totally entertains me - great script)
30 Days of Night (just creepy)
The Ring (another classic)
The Grudge (I liked the writing style of this one)
Cabin in the Woods (clever horror)
Cabin Fever (Eli Roth at his best - love this one)
Scream (the whole series is mindless and not particularly scary but still fun to watch)
Carrie (any version)
Scary Movie (The original was best. Gotta love Doofy)
Any Zombie movies - either the ones that are meant to be scary or stuff like Shaun of the Dead
I try ever year to get into the vintage slasher flicks like Halloween and Friday the 13th but I tend to get bored because they're so formulaic. I get that they set the scene for horror and are the standard classics but they're just not for me.
Biodegradable dog poop bags that fucking biodegrade if you leave them in your pockets for too long. Took out last year's cold weather jacket and put my hand in the pocket and it's like an instant handful of confetti that explodes all over your pocket and hands and whatever you're wearing when you take your hand out of the pocket. Takes fucking foreverrrr to clean up while peeling all the little teeny tiny flakey shards off your clothes and floor and pocket liner and skin. You'd think I'd learn but nope - these goddamn bags biodegrade in gym-bags, purses, pockets... Fuck.
My advice follows the same as what's posted. It's called cheating a blow-job. Basically you get his dick and your hand wet with saliva etc and concentrate on sucking the head of his cock while simultaneously giving him a hand-job on the shaft.
Re the taste of cum - you either have to just gulp it down and try not to wince (really it's just a couple of seconds anyway) or be all dirty girl for him, toss your hair a bit, lick your lips with lots of teasing eye contact and get all breathy and girly-voiced and tell him you want him to cum on your face or all over your tits as you keep that handjob going at a good pace.
Yeah, I think gender roles can affect these things to some degree.
Men have that chase and conquer kind of spirit and looks and status often doesn't dissuade them from at least trying. It's in their blood and they don't take it as personally as women do when they are rejected. That would in part explain how ugly old men with paunches and a nice sum of cash in the bank still feel completely justified in approaching 21 yr old models in bars and hitting on them hard. I just think *in general* men are more likely to try and try again and not take it as a huge ego-blow when they strike out. The onus has usually been on them to pursue and initiate things so they have to have thicker skin about it and are more likely to call it as it is.
Women, however, are usually not as likely as men to put it on the line and go after a guy they perceive they have no chance of being with. They tend to look for signs and signals and yeah, probably rate guys as lower as a bit of a self-protective measure. As well - whereas guys probably base their ratings strictly on the physical, I think women (especially the relationship-oriented types) are more likely to base their ratings on an overall impression that isn't just beauty-related but includes "oh, he's too vain, he's too metro, he's a player, look at his ego - bleh!" etc etc. Maybe they factor in details related to what they think the guy would be like as a prospective relationship and not just for sex. I think men are more likely to say "yeah she's a 9 out of 10, but she's a total headcase etc" because they're thinking yeah, she's nuts but they'd still fuck her at least once, whereas women that don't do casual sex, just tend to go for an overall impression score. With that score, they explain away reasons why they're not into him and don't find him appealing if they can't envision ever actually being with him or being desired by him.
I'm not the type to rate a hot guy as a 4 just because I don't think he'd give me the time of day, but then I'm maybe not as relationship-oriented as many other females. There are plenty of guys I'd rate as highly attractive - strictly as a sex thing. I have seen women talk-down a hot guy before based on the criticisms listed above though. I think it especially happens in a bar environment with single females that maybe aren't that confident... "Hey what about that guy - he's hot!" and invariably there will be a list of reasons why they have zero interest in him and don't think he's all that. I just think women are less likely to admit something if they foresee a dead end. Perhaps it's the social assumption that women, especially in a bar environment, should be able to get laid more easily *if* they want it, whereas guys have already prepared themselves for the hit and misses. Now *if* somehow that hot '4 out of 10' shows them a bit of interest or does some fun flirting, I have also witnessed that same girl form an -crush on him and turn into a starry-eyed school-girl pretty quick.
I dunno - just thinking out loud on potential theories. Haven't had coffee yet.
An energy drink first thing in the morning is pretty harsh on the stomach. I save those for the occasional afternoon boost if I need it or for evening just before going out or mixed with vodka.
Lately I've been having a coffee at some point during the morning but not always first-thing. I prefer a protein shake or smoothie to start. If I'm super tired though or didn't sleep well, I'll turn the keurig on while I'm in the shower and go for the bold dark roast or a double-espresso.
All in all, it's still healthier than some of my stay-awake habits of years past.
First of all, I'm not in the lifestyle, so my opinion may not matter here.
But... I strongly dislike the idea of manipulation of another under the guise of 'chivalry/etiquette' or 'BDSM rules' or whatever it is a Dom considers as acceptable behaviour by anyone he considers an underling.
My assumption was that if one considers themselves a sub that they show respect to Doms in general, but that they are still a free-agent and have autonomy over themselves, their time and their attention.
While I don't know the rules of the game, I'm posting because it pisses me off when I see manipulation, subtle social threats and the equivalent of 'slut-shaming' as a method of trying to control someone or bully them into something they don't want to do. Whoever this guy is, he's a first class Asshole (and I capped the 'A' since he calls himself a Dom). You did nothing wrong, littlebirdie - whether in a BDSM environment or a general social environment. There are no implied promises just because you're chatting with a guy. Until you make a commitment, you still get to choose.
