Quote by Hasabrain2
But I kid you not, after we were done and just lying in the bed exhausted, she said, "That was almost as good as Dirk."
Ouch. That can be the downside of being with beautiful people.

It’s a tough situation. Is it a betrayal for you to go smoke some dick? Then again, maybe your wife refusing you is a betrayal too. These are up for you to decide.
I’ve only sucked a dick once, but it was really awesome. If I ever decide I’m ready to do it again - and that day may come - I’ll can’t wait to get a hot penis pumping my mouth full of jizz again. Truly a wonderful taste and feeling.
Glad you had a good time at the club, and “All these beautiful dicks walking around waiting to be sucked” has me hard and stroking just thinking about it.
I’ve found Grammarly to be incredibly helpful in catching errors that my eyes skim over. And incredibly boneheaded in its suggestions about almost everything else.
By the way, I only use the browser add-in, which I enable only when I need it, and NOT the application. There was a time a couple of years ago, when I was still on a Mac, that my computer kept getting slower and slower, to where it was almost unusable, even if I was hardly running anything. Restarting didn’t help, either. The system monitor revealed that the Grammarly app was gorging itself on resources - doing what, God only knows. I deleted the app and my system immediately worked fine again. That is malware, as far as I'm concerned.
Didn’t use to, and they’ll never be the the same to me as supple female tits, but as I’ve grown more attracted to men (no longer just their cocks) I like the idea of cupping a guy’s moobs and tweaking his nipples while I ram him. Or suckling him while he fucks me from above.
Went to them fairly often when younger, but haven’t been to one since well before the Pandemic.
I found that some jurisdictions didn’t have enclosed booths at all, just semi-open stalls. Others had real booths offering total privacy. I suspect the regional variations are due to local laws and/or enforcement, although Constitutionally, I don't see how local jurisdictions get away with regulating private sexual behavior like this. Only been to one establishment.with actual glory holes, and the tale of that glorious visit is here: A Hole New World.
The 100% true story of me sucking my first (and only) cock.
TrueI have many times, especially when I lived in the Pacific NW. People there are less uptight about it, and at least amongst young people it's not uncommon to skinny-dip at lakes or hot springs. At least a little more frowned-upon elsewhere, I think. I have hiked naked too, in several western states. That's a little more daring, obviously.
Quote by boredchic34
So just curious you guys.....whats the longest amount of time you have gone (one session not having to stop to get hard again).
Probably an hour or so. I was drunk - but, somehow, not too drunk to be hard - and just pumped her forever without cumming. Came zero times, because she eventually asked me to stop so she could sleep.
And what is the most times ypu have cum in one fuck session?
You might want to rethink your definition of "session." The way you put it, it is basically only possible for a guy to cum once.
On the other hand, if by "session" you mean "an evening together, focused entirely on sex, but taking turns pleasuring each other," I once came least four times during one particularly memorable session that started around 9pm and went to 5am.
Wow, congratulations! Only seventeen? I didn’t realize it was such elite company. Well done.
Personally, I have a plan to get to Prolific, but Omnium seems a whole other deal. As you said, doing so would ultimately require me to delve into things that disturb me. I have quite a few writing goals that are more important to me right now, but I suppose I could get inspired someday.
Quote by SydneySider
I dont want a pilot flying my plane with my family on it who only got the job because they met some DEI target.
I find that racists in itself that a DEI hire gets picked if I am more qualified.
First off, even if airlines are making some effort to diversify their workforce and considering race, gender or economic background, no one hiring on as a pilot "only gets the job because they met some DEI target" (those are your words). There are still very high minimum standards. I'm a middle-aged white guy, and even in a completely colorblind application process, I'm pretty sure I can't just go get a pilot job. Please engage your brain and think about how the hiring process for a pilot might actually work. The Righties have been making this specious argument pretty loudly for several years now, so if you think you're somehow making an original case, you're not.
Second, racism and discrimination are different words with different meanings. If "DEI hires" are getting picked over more qualified white males, and you have not proven that this as a widespread thing, then that is (by definition) Discrimination. But also by definition, unless it is serving to perpetuate the subjugation of an underprivileged race - and we white people don't qualify as an underprivileged race, under any reasonable interpretation - then that is not racism. You can scream "discrimination" if that happens, but you don't get to scream "racism." Learn your words.
Quote by dannig
This would mean Civil War.
Civil war, which many on the far right have wanted for years to provoke, may well be coming sooner than that.
Besides being a sop to those in his rural base who hate cities, Trump's/Hegseth's military invasions of "Democrat cities" seem deliberately intended to provoke resistance. Even a small amount of violence (or possibly even nonviolent resistance) on the part of protesters in the occupied cities will likely result in a disproportionate response, supported rabidly by Trump's base, and could quickly spiral out of control.
By renaming the Department of Defense to Department of War, Trump threatening in a speech this week to use domestic cities as "training grounds" for troops who are not ordinarily allowed to fight on American soil, and Hegseth boldly proclaiming an increased emphasis on military "lethality," the Administration is openly signaling a desire to wage civil war.
Keep an eye on what happens in Portland. Illegally federalized Oregon troops occupied the city for the first time yesterday, with a bit of violence perpetrated against protestors but cooler heads mostly prevailing. Then the city seemed to get a reprieve last night, with a Federal judge temporarily ordering a halt. That case will go to the Ninth Circuit, which is almost certain to uphold yesterday's ruling. And then ... it will go to SCOTUS, probably on the emergency docket, and who the fuck knows what they're thinking anymore?
Meanwhile today, Trump executed an end run around last night's ruling, whose scope was limited to the Oregon National Guard, by sending up the illegally federalized California National Guard. Watch this space and pray.
I think I’ve seen that in most past competitions, the front-page banner gets taken down the moment the deadline for entries has passed.
Seems to me the competition isn’t over until the winners are announced. Why not leave the banner up at least until the announcement, or maybe even a couple days longer, to draw more attention to all these wonderful contest entries, highlighting the best of Lush?
Tori might have gotten her reward in the previous chapter, but Joe and Eric are in for their own treat as she spins out Tori’s Torrid Tale, telling of the relationship she enjoyed with lesbian Jackie during her earlier separation from Eric. My first solely woman-to-woman story, this is the latest installment of my wildly Bisexual MIDLIFE RENEWAL series, and the first chapter in which a woman explores her Bisexuality. For what it's worth, this has been published on Bisexuality Awareness Day!
The torrid story of Tori's first time with a woman
LesbianLike GMOFL said, there are a lot of reasons possible, starting with age. When you’re 20 you can get and stay hard for almost no reason at all. By 50, I found that I had to be mentally stimulated - truly into what and whom I’m doing, and not anxious about it, or I’ll shrink right up.
So if he’s middle aged, the guy has to really into it. Maybe he’s really into your wife and he’s letting you be present as a favor to her - or you. Maybe he got a little remorse, either for cutting into your marriage or for being around a hard naked guy. Maybe he’s not really bi and the sight of your dick turned him off. Maybe he was insecure not about her but about you … guys are competitive, and he wasn’t ready to have another guy see him hard and naked.
As everyone else has said, give him another chance and make it low-pressure, so that erectile performance is not necessary for a good result. Make it more about exploring each other’s bodies and exchanging tactile and oral pleasure than penetrative. And offer your support as another guy. If/when it comes up again, make yourself vulnerable and admit it’s happened to you.
Not going to celebrate any political assassination, even of an asshole like Kirk. I despise his speech, vehemently, but I have to defend his right to exercise it. Regular assassinations of people like him and Melissa Hortman (even closer to home for me) for participating in public life are terrorism, plain and simple. And a very, very bad omen for our country's future.
And for the world's. It's not just the USA that is fucked, as dannig pointed out, the way things are going. The dearth of assault weapons in other countries might seem comforting, but no one is safe from the dehumanization of political opponents and the normalization of political violence that is reaching every corner of the globe.
You certainly could publish it here in the Novels category, Milik. Your idea immediately reminds me of Ursula K. LeGuin’s writing, especially The Left Hand of Darkness, although other of her stories also explored gender and sexuality adaptations of humans different than found naturally on Earth. I’m not that big into sci-fi generally, but a hardcore envisioning of something like Left Hand would have me cumming every few pages.
Quote by Marco12
I think she damaged me. It was too painful to ejaculate for nearly two weeks because my balls were really sore. But I've tried to jerk off and I can't get any cum. I'm worried she has kicked me far too hard and I really want to jerk off.
if any of this is actually true, get yourself to a doctor, NOW.
Just published! My entry is Secret Sixties, in which my lust and my remorse battle for control of my mind and body. Forced retirement, a burgeoning friendship and a low-sex marriage create a quagmire of conflicting, escalating feelings that tempt me to cheat on my wife.
I have read some excellent stories on Lush set in churches, usually featuring irreverent takes somewhere between sarcasm and sacrilege. My entry, by contrast, presents a more earnest and modern angle on religion as Joe struggles with questions of faith, fidelity and fucking. I hope readers enjoy this exploration.
Retirement comes unexpectedly. And so do I. In church.
CheatingWow, I haven't heard anything about this. I would expect leading dual lives to be very difficult in an Amish community, due to the communal nature of living and the lack of privacy.
Mennonites, on the other hand, sound to me like a more diverse collection. I'm aware of urban Mennonite churches in multiple cities, and those congregations, at least, are remarkably progressive.
Obviously, when you use it to describe a person, the word “Lesbian” (whether as a noun or an adjective) refers to the person’s orientation. Those usages are exclusive to women who exclusively love women. Linguistic territory (and centuries of oppression) acknowledged.
However, if we are getting technical, it seems to me that when used as an adjective modifying “sex”, then it is describing the sex, not necessarily the participants’ orientation. That’s just how adjectives work.
As pointed out by others, it’s all very analogous to the word “gay.” Put less abstractly, since this point is personal to me as a lifelong bisexual: I do not consider myself gay in orientation, but I enjoy gay sex, and I don’t hesitate to call it that.
Yet another of the bazillion tropes - and one of the oldest ones - in porn that misleads people about real sex. Guys in porn always pull out to prove they came for the camera. It’s performative, period. No other reason. Yes, guys do sometimes enjoy spewing on their lover, but porn is wrong about the degree to which that is true.
Personally, nine times out of ten I would rather cum in someone than on someone. As someone who has a penis, I can say that the physical sensation of cumming while you are enveloped somewhere warm and snug (whether vagina, mouth or rectum) is ten times better than cumming out into the open air by someone’s hand. It’s not even close. When a guy would rather cum on you, it’s for the visual or for the idea of it, not for the physical feeling.