Good for you for trying new things, welshstallion.

When I was a young man, there was a time that I'd gone over a year without sex, and I genuinely contemplated the 10-12 hour drive to visit a Nevada brothel.
It never happened, possibly because I ended up sucking a guy through a gloryhole instead. And I had a couple of hookups with women not long after that, taking off some of the pressure. Still might have been fun to try the brothel, though.
I seem to be at my most creative when Iām either on vacation or particularly stressed. When Iām just plain busy with the rigmarole of routine daily life, I donāt seem to write as much or as well, though I still plug along in fits and starts. I guess that means that Iām at my best writing when Iām either having an escape from normal life, or seeking an escape.
As for the effect that writing has on me, while I feel like I probably shouldnāt be seeking validation in the likes and comments to my publications, there is no question that I do bask in that validation when it happens, and the āsuccessā (by that metric) of my stories after publication certainly affects my mood. I just published a new one yesterday, and - ugh - here I am, checking on it more often than is probably healthy.
The other effect that writing has on my mood is before publication. Since it is basically a process of fleshing out my sexual fantasies, I find it highly stimulating. My self-enjoyment activity increases markedly when Iām actively writing.
Iāve never gone to the effort of actually writing (which I take to mean spending the hours to get a story past the outline stage) unless I really intended to publish it someday.
Not counting my many brief sketches of ideas, my unpublished work tends to be either (1) fully- or mostly-written stories into which Iāve put a few hours to flesh out a first draft, but not yet the many more hours needed to make it ready to publish, or (2) leftover story fragments too good to throw away after rearranging or cannibalizing to make some other story ready to publish.
In both scenarios, the intent to publish was there while I was making the effort to write, and at least with the scenario (1) stories it still is. Like everything else in life, itās a matter of taking the time to get it done. Thatās not just idle hope, though, because my backlog of semi-finished stories has gotten shorter in the past two years. EDIT; just fact-checked this, and yes, Iām down to about fifteen stories in the hopper that are mostly-written but need polishing.
Yep, once I figured out to add cover images to my stories, I went back and edited the two or three dozen Iād already published, making NO changes except adding the cover images and putting the Note To Moderator explaining thatās all that Iād changed, just as Seeker4 says.
In each case, they got reapproved quickly. That would probably not have happened if I hadnāt put in a Note to Moderator.
And also like Seeker4 said, there are stricter rules for cover images than for pics posted elsewhere on the site.
Rediscovered! reignites my bisexual Becoming A Man series exploring my sexuality as a young man, which has been dormant for a couple of years. Actually, this story is man-on-man only, but the series is bisexual. Two years ago, Eric discovered me trying to suck myself, leading to mutual pleasures ... followed by a scary freakout on his part. Now he is ready to offer me not only apologies, but gratitude. And maybe his extra-long cock.
I never wanted to talk to Eric again. Let alone suck him off again. Yet somehow I still did.
Gay MaleQuote by Hornydude53
Iām intrigued as to how you lick a clit like itās a cock? Does she have a large clit?
Iāve been with women whose clit got noticeably erect, and who had enough clit and/or labia to suck into my mouth like a little cock. While most women have enjoyed me sucking on their outer parts and swirling my tongue around, none ever explicitly asked me to suck them as if they had a penis. Sadly.
Never had this, but being Bisexual, I would love it! From what I can gather, many women feel threatened by things like male bisexual activity that suggest us needing them less. The woman who genuinely and confidently wants her man to try it is a rare gem.
She may be just having some fun role play in the heat of the moment, but itās possible sheās curious about seeing you try the real thing. Like kinkme said, you might try playing along and see where it goes. Maybe nowhere, and just because you play along with this fantasy doesnāt mean you actually have to suck a real cock it if you donāt want to.
Some people assume that because Iām Bisexual, I must be turned on by crossdressing too. I donāt find it either a turn-on or a hard turn-off, but as with a lot of things, what turns my partner on might turn me on. If I was with a guy who was really into it, I could be too. In fact, I will have a hot cross-dressing story coming up, probably early next year.
If by cuckolding you mean humiliating the husband while he watches someone else fuck his wife, I give that a very hard pass. Iām into sex as an uplifting activity for all involved, and putting people down turns me off. But Iāll give a big thumbs-up if youāre talking about hotwife activity, where a guy enjoys sharing his wife, and everyone involved is turned on by that.
Six, seven minutes on average, I suppose.
When I was younger I did go pretty long, probably half an hour, a few times. There was one time when I was young and drunk, and it was very late at night, and the girl I was with asked me to stop because I just couldnāt seem to cum. A rare event for me!
Depends on what you mean by āduring sex.ā Can I get hard enough to penetrate again, immediately after cumming? No, and I never could. Iāve always needed a few minutes between rounds, so I could never go a second time āduring sexā unless you count going down on my partner for a while or engaging in pillow talk as I recover.
Do I need more time now, in my fifties? Probably. But if the situation is stimulating enough (as might be the case, for example, with a new partner) Iām sure I could go again before long.
Someone pointed out earlier in the chat that it's "against the law," but that's not true everywhere. If you have the financial means to do so, I'd recommend booking a trip to somewhere that prostitution is either tacitly or explicitly legal. You're less likely to get in trouble, you're less likely to catch a disease, the woman you're with is more likely to make a living wage, and you're less likely to contribute to organized crime. Amsterdam's the obvious destination if you're in the UK, and from what I understand you're pretty safe and should be treated well at a reputable Red Light District establishment.
If, on the other hand, you (or someone else reading this, looking for the same advice) were in the US, I would suggest you immediately book a flight and car rental in Las Vegas or Reno. Prostitution is NOT legal in Nevada's more populous counties (you will be arrested if you try), but it is everywhere else in the state, contributing significantly to rural economies. Which is why you need the car. Directions to the numerous legal, reputable "ranches" outstate where you can go for it legally are ludicrously easy to find, and several of them are a reasonably short drive from the cities. From what I've heard, a good "ranch" visit may cost you several hundred dollars, but you will get your pick from a number of attractive women who take pride in their work - and especially the sacred duty of showing a man his first time.
I feel for you frontierguy, but marriages usually need to have a really strong sex base in order to successfully bring in other people, or talk about this big of a new adventure. If she hasn't already expressed an interest in going down on a woman - or if, as you've hinted, is actively turned off by the idea - I very much doubt there's any chance of "convincing" her.
Given what you've said here and on other forum posts, I'm sorry to say your choices are probably (1) go without sex, or (2) safely and discreetly pursue it outside the marriage. As Dan Savage would put it, (2) isn't without risk - somebody could recognize you at the gay club you've mentioned. But I think he also considers ensuring each other's sexual happiness to be an essential component of a relationship, and if your wife is unwilling to help with that, you might feel justified going elsewhere. I personally know of a few guys here on Lush whose married sex lives have gone cold, but being here on Lush helps them keep their sanity while they stick with (1), and gives them a safe space to talk about whether to go for (2).
Option (3), DTMFA, which Dan sometimes advises, is pretty extreme, and I wouldn't necessarily advise it. It's fine for young people without kids, but for us older folks that's pretty difficult socially, financially and emotionally after building a life together.
Itās a tough situation. Is it a betrayal for you to go smoke some dick? Then again, maybe your wife refusing you is a betrayal too. These are up for you to decide.
Iāve only sucked a dick once, but it was really awesome. If I ever decide Iām ready to do it again - and that day may come - Iāll canāt wait to get a hot penis pumping my mouth full of jizz again. Truly a wonderful taste and feeling.
Glad you had a good time at the club, and āAll these beautiful dicks walking around waiting to be suckedā has me hard and stroking just thinking about it.
Iāve found Grammarly to be incredibly helpful in catching errors that my eyes skim over. And incredibly boneheaded in its suggestions about almost everything else.
By the way, I only use the browser add-in, which I enable only when I need it, and NOT the application. There was a time a couple of years ago, when I was still on a Mac, that my computer kept getting slower and slower, to where it was almost unusable, even if I was hardly running anything. Restarting didnāt help, either. The system monitor revealed that the Grammarly app was gorging itself on resources - doing what, God only knows. I deleted the app and my system immediately worked fine again. That is absolutely unacceptable.
Didnāt use to, and theyāll never be the the same to me as supple female tits, but as Iāve grown more attracted to men (no longer just their cocks) I like the idea of cupping a guyās moobs and tweaking his nipples while I ram him. Or suckling him while he fucks me from above.
Went to them fairly often when younger, but havenāt been to one since well before the Pandemic.
I found that some jurisdictions didnāt have enclosed booths at all, just semi-open stalls. Others had real booths offering total privacy. I suspect the regional variations are due to local laws and/or enforcement. Only been to one establishment.with actual glory holes, and the tale of that glorious visit is here: A Hole New World.
The 100% true story of me sucking my first (and only) cock.
TrueI have many times, especially when I lived in the Pacific NW. People there are less uptight about it, and at least amongst young people it's not uncommon to skinny-dip at lakes or hot springs. At least a little more frowned-upon elsewhere, I think. I have hiked naked too, in several western states. That's a little more daring, obviously.
Quote by boredchic34
So just curious you guys.....whats the longest amount of time you have gone (one session not having to stop to get hard again).
Probably an hour or so. I was drunk - but, somehow, not too drunk to be hard - and just pumped her forever without cumming. Came zero times, because she eventually asked me to stop so she could sleep.
And what is the most times ypu have cum in one fuck session?
You might want to rethink your definition of "session." The way you put it, it is basically only possible for a guy to cum once.
On the other hand, if by "session" you mean "an evening together, focused entirely on sex, but taking turns pleasuring each other," I once came least four times during one particularly memorable session that started around 9pm and went to 5am.
Wow, congratulations! Only seventeen? I didnāt realize it was such elite company. Well done.
Personally, I have a plan to get to Prolific, but Omnium seems a whole other deal. As you said, doing so would ultimately require me to delve into things that disturb me. I have quite a few writing goals that are more important to me right now, but I suppose I could get inspired someday.
Quote by SydneySider
I dont want a pilot flying my plane with my family on it who only got the job because they met some DEI target.
I find that racists in itself that a DEI hire gets picked if I am more qualified.
First off, even if airlines are making some effort to diversify their workforce and considering race, gender or economic background, no one hiring on as a pilot "only gets the job because they met some DEI target" (those are your words). There are still very high minimum standards. I'm a middle-aged white guy, and even in a completely colorblind application process, I'm pretty sure I can't just go get a pilot job. Please engage your brain and think about how the hiring process for a pilot might actually work. The Righties have been making this specious argument pretty loudly for several years now, so if you think you're somehow making an original case, you're not.
Second, racism and discrimination are different words with different meanings. If "DEI hires" are getting picked over more qualified white males, and you have not proven that this as a widespread thing, then that is (by definition) Discrimination. But also by definition, unless it is serving to perpetuate the subjugation of an underprivileged race - and we white people don't qualify as an underprivileged race, under any reasonable interpretation - then that is not racism. You can scream "discrimination" if that happens, but you don't get to scream "racism." Learn your words.
Quote by dannig
This would mean Civil War.
Civil war, which many on the far right have wanted for years to provoke, may well be coming sooner than that.
Besides being a sop to those in his rural base who hate cities, Trump's/Hegseth's military invasions of "Democrat cities" seem deliberately intended to provoke resistance. Even a small amount of violence (or possibly even nonviolent resistance) on the part of protesters in the occupied cities will likely result in a disproportionate response, supported rabidly by Trump's base, and could quickly spiral out of control.
By renaming the Department of Defense to Department of War, Trump threatening in a speech this week to use domestic cities as "training grounds" for troops who are not ordinarily allowed to fight on American soil, and Hegseth boldly proclaiming an increased emphasis on military "lethality," the Administration is openly signaling a desire to wage civil war.
Keep an eye on what happens in Portland. Illegally federalized Oregon troops occupied the city for the first time yesterday, with a bit of violence perpetrated against protestors but cooler heads mostly prevailing. Then the city seemed to get a reprieve last night, with a Federal judge temporarily ordering a halt. That case will go to the Ninth Circuit, which is almost certain to uphold yesterday's ruling. And then ... it will go to SCOTUS, probably on the emergency docket, and who the fuck knows what they're thinking anymore?
Meanwhile today, Trump executed an end run around last night's ruling, whose scope was limited to the Oregon National Guard, by sending up the illegally federalized California National Guard. Watch this space and pray.