Quote by David_LeRoy
the site should treat that with the same direct responce one gets from other flagrant violations of the submission guidelines. Warning, suspension and ban
If we could prove it, that would be something I'd love to implement. But:
AI tools can clone a writing style in seconds, even if the story isn't all that engaging.
Authors can generate a boilerplate via AI and then edit it. At that point, how much is their work vs the machine's work, given they instructed the machine to write a story based on a premise the author dreamed up, and then put their own spin on it?
We ask authors to use things like Grammarly to flag/correct obvious grammar snafus. But those tools now say: "hey, while I'm here, this sentence might sound better like this... want me to change it for you?" and bases its suggestion on content stolen/plagiarized from others. So even if the author wrote it from scratch, AI is assisting them to make it better... and we asked them to do it (sort of) to keep the site quality up.
With all the above shades of usage, it's difficult to prove one way or another how much input a machine has had, so we're stuck with it at present.
All we can do is encourage authors to use their brains to have a go at writing, keep their synapse plasticity ticking into old age, and enjoy the process of bringing something to life instead of taking a shortcut